The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Polymorphisms in the DNA repair genes XRCC1 and ERCC2 and biomarkers of DNA damage in human blood mononuclear cells
Abstract
Polymorphisms in several DNA repair genes have recently been identified, but little is known about their phenotypic significance. To determine whether variation in DNA repair genes is related to host DNA damage, we studied the association between polymorphisms in XRCC1 (codon 399) and ERCC2 (codon 751) and two markers of DNA damage, sister chromatid exchange (SCE) frequencies (n = 76) and polyphenol DNA adducts (n = 61). SCE frequencies were determined using a modified fluorescence-Giemsa method and polyphenol DNA adducts were determined using a P1-enhanced (32)P-post-labeling procedure. XRCC1 and ERCC2 genotypes were identified using PCR-RFLP. Mean SCE frequencies among current smokers who were homozygous carriers of the 399Gln allele in XRCC1 were greater than those in 399Arg/Arg current smokers. We also observed a possible gene-dosage effect for XRCC1 399Gln and detectable DNA adducts, and significantly more adducts among older subjects who were carriers of the 399Gln allele than in younger subjects with the 399Arg/Arg genotype. The polymorphism in ERCC2 was unrelated to SCE frequency or DNA adduct level. Our results suggest that carriers of the polymorphic XRCC1 399Gln allele may be at greater risk for tobacco- and age-related DNA damage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A superfamily of conserved domains in DNA damage‐ responsive cell cycle checkpoint proteins
Bork, P., Hofmann, K., Bucher, P., Neuwald, A. F., Altschul, S. F., & Koonin, E. V. (1997) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fasebj.11.1.9034168 · Cited by 746
Cited by
Oxidative DNA damage: mechanisms, mutation, and disease
Cooke, M. S., Evans, M. D., Dizdaroglu, M., & Lunec, J. (2003) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.02-0752rev · Cited by 3,245
T cells and aging january 2002 update
Pawelec, G. (2002) · Frontiers in Bioscience · doi:10.2741/a831 · Cited by 369
Qiao, Y., Spitz, M. R., Shen, H., Guo, Z., Shete, S., Hedayati, M., Grossman, L., Mohrenweiser, H., & Wei, Q. (2002) · Carcinogenesis · doi:10.1093/carcin/23.2.295 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- Duell, E. J.
- Venue
- Carcinogenesis
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-05-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 965-971
- ISSN
- 0143-3334 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2180
- OpenAlex
- W1983585864
- Cited by
- 447
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Polymorphisms in the DNA repair genes XRCC1 and ERCC2 and biomarkers of DNA damage in human blood mononuclear cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/carcin/21.5.965
- The paper
- Duell, E. J. (2000). Polymorphisms in the DNA repair genes XRCC1 and ERCC2 and biomarkers of DNA damage in human blood mononuclear cells. Carcinogenesis. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/21.5.965
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.