Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 177

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

32P-Post-labelling analysis of DNA adducts formed in the livers of animals treated with safrole, estragole and other naturally-occurring alkenylbenzenes. I. Adult female CD-1 mice

Randerath, Kurt, Haglund, Roberta E., Phillips, David H., Reddy, M. Vijayaraj·1984·Carcinogenesis

Abstract

The binding of a series of alkenylbenzenes to liver DNA of adult female CD-1 mice, isolated 24 h after i.p. administration of non-radioactive test compound (2 or 10 mg/mouse), was investigated by a modified 32P-post-labelling assay. The known hepatocarcinogens, safrole, estragole and methyleugenol, exhibited the strongest binding to mouse-liver DNA (1 adduct in 10 000 - 15 000 DNA nucleotides or 200 - 300 pmol adduct/mg DNA after administration of a 10 mg dose), while several related compounds, which have not been shown thus far to be carcinogenic in rodent bioassays, bound to mouse-liver DNA at 3 - 200x lower levels. The latter compounds included allylbenzene, anethole, myristicin, parsley apiol, dill apiol and elemicin. Eugenol did not bind. Low binding to mouse-liver DNA was also observed for the weak hepatocarcinogen, isosafrole. Two main 32P-labelled adducts, which appeared to be guanine derivatives, were detected for each of the binding chemicals on thin-layer chromatograms. The loss of safrole adducts from liver DNA was biphasic: a rapid loss during the first week (t 1/2 approximately 3 days) was followed by a much slower decline up to 20 weeks after treatment (t 1/2 approximately 2.5 months). Adducts formed by reaction of 1'-acetoxysafrole, a model ultimate carcinogen, with mouse-liver DNA in vitro were chromatographically identical to safrole-DNA adducts formed in vivo. Pretreatment with pentachlorophenol, a known inhibitor of sulphotransferases, inhibited the binding of safrole to mouse-liver DNA, providing further evidence that the metabolic activation of the allylbenzenes proceeds by the formation of 1'-hydroxy derivatives as proximate carcinogens and 1'-sulphoöxy derivatives as ultimate carcinogens.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/carcin/5.12.1613

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 177

Metadata

Authors
Randerath, K., Haglund, R. E., Phillips, D. H., & Reddy, M. V.
Venue
Carcinogenesis
Published
1984
Volume
5
Issue
12
Pages
1613-1622
ISSN
  • 0143-3334 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2180
OpenAlex
W4253787555
Cited by
177
References
0
FWCI
2.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 32P-Post-labelling analysis of DNA adducts formed in the livers of animals treated with safrole, estragole and other naturally-occurring alkenylbenzenes. I. Adult female CD-1 mice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/carcin/5.12.1613
The paper
Randerath, K., Haglund, R. E., Phillips, D. H., & Reddy, M. V. (1984). 32P-Post-labelling analysis of DNA adducts formed in the livers of animals treated with safrole, estragole and other naturally-occurring alkenylbenzenes. I. Adult female CD-1 mice. Carcinogenesis. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/5.12.1613

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.