The DOI matches its Crossref record.
32P-Post-labelling analysis of DNA adducts formed in the livers of animals treated with safrole, estragole and other naturally-occurring alkenylbenzenes. II. Newborn male B6C3F1 mice
Abstract
When a series of nine alkenylbenzenes were administered to preweanling male mice, safrole, estragole and methyleugenol induced a significant incidence of hepatic carcinomas, while eugenol, anethole, elemicin, myristicin, dill apiol and parsley apiol did not (Miller et al., Cancer Res., 43, 1124-1134, 1983). Following the protocol used to test seven of these compounds, male C57Bl X C3H/He F1 mice were injected with 0.25, 0.5, 1.0 and 3.0 mumol of a compound on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 after birth, respectively. Groups of mice were killed and their liver DNA isolated on days 23, 29 and 43, and analysed by a modified 32P-post-labelling procedure. Highest levels of adducts were detected with methyleugenol (72.7 pmol/mg DNA), estragole (30.0) and safrole (17.5). After correction for liver growth it was estimated that most of these adducts were still present at 43 days. Significant levels of DNA binding by myristicin (7.8 pmol/mg DNA) and elemicin (3.7) were also found but in the former case the adducts were less persistent. Only low levels of adducts were detected with anethole, dill apiol and parsley apiol (less than 1.4 pmol/mg DNA); no DNA binding was detected with eugenol. Thus, all but one of the alkenylbenzenes studied became bound to newborn mouse-liver DNA, but the levels and the persistence of adducts formed by the carcinogenic compounds were greater.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Accelerated DNA adduct formation in the lung of the Nrf2 knockout mouse exposed to diesel exhaust
Aoki, Y., Sato, H., Nishimura, N., Takahashi, S., Itoh, K., & Yamamoto, M. (2001) · Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology · doi:10.1006/taap.2001.9176 · Cited by 297
Smith, R. L., Adams, T. B., Doull, J., Feron, V. J., Goodman, J. I., Marnett, L. J., Portoghese, P. S., Waddell, W. J., Wagner, B. M., Rogers, A. E., et al. (2002) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/s0278-6915(02)00012-1 · Cited by 255
Metadata
- Authors
- Phillips, D. H., Reddy, M. V., & Randerath, K.
- Venue
- Carcinogenesis
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1984
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1623-1628
- ISSN
- 0143-3334 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2180
- OpenAlex
- W2011795438
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 32P-Post-labelling analysis of DNA adducts formed in the livers of animals treated with safrole, estragole and other naturally-occurring alkenylbenzenes. II. Newborn male B6C3F1 mice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/carcin/5.12.1623
- The paper
- Phillips, D. H., Reddy, M. V., & Randerath, K. (1984). 32P-Post-labelling analysis of DNA adducts formed in the livers of animals treated with safrole, estragole and other naturally-occurring alkenylbenzenes. II. Newborn male B6C3F1 mice. Carcinogenesis. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/5.12.1623
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.