Cited by 142Carcinogens and Genotoxicity AssessmentAir Quality and Health ImpactsIndoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure

Ultrafine particulate matter and high-level benzene urban air pollution in relation to oxidative DNA damage

Avogbe, P. H.·2004·Carcinogenesis

Abstract

Air pollution, containing high-level of ultrafine particles (UFP) and benzene, is a prominent environmental health problem in many cities of the World. We investigated the level of oxidative DNA damage in mononuclear blood cells (MNBC) by the comet assay as DNA strand breaks (SB) and formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase (FPG) sensitive sites in residents from three urban locations in Cotonou, Benin (taxi-moto drivers, subjects living near roads with intense traffic and suburban residents) and rural residents. Exposure was characterized by urinary excretion of S-phenylmercapturic acid (S-PMA), a biomarker of benzene exposure, and by ambient UFP. There were clear stepwise gradients with respect to ambient UFP, S-PMA excretion and oxidative DNA damage with rural subjects < suburban subjects < residents living near highly trafficed roads<taxi-moto drivers. Polymorphisms in glutathione peroxidase (GPX), NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1) and glutathione S-transferase (GST) genes were assessed for effect modification. Subjects with GSTT1 null genotype had lower urinary S-PMA excretion than subjects carrying the plus genotype. Urinary S-PMA excretion correlated with SB (R = 0.17) and FPG sites (R = 0.25) in MNBC. The correlation between S-PMA and SB was strongest in subjects with NQO1*1/*2 and *2/*2 genotypes (R = 0.37), and between S-PMA and FPG sensitive sites in subjects with the GSTP1*B/*B genotype (R = 0.39). In conclusion, this study shows that urban air with high levels o…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/carcin/bgh353

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Avogbe, P. H.
Affiliations
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Avogbe, P. H.
Venue
Carcinogenesis
Published
2004-09-09
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
613-620
ISSN
  • 0143-3334 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2180
OpenAlex
W2161171605
Cited by
142
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Carcinogenesis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Environment
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
Keywords
ultrafine particles, benzene exposure, oxidative DNA damage, DNA strand breaks, Fpg-sensitive sites, blood mononuclear cells, S-phenylmercapturic acid, urinary biomarkers, urban air pollution, traffic-related air pollution, Cotonou
MeSH terms
Air Pollutants, Benzene, DNA Damage, Humans, Male, Particle Size, Urban Health, Biomarkers, Oxidative Stress

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review