Cited by 1Ovarian function and disordersDiet, Metabolism, and DiseaseDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Metabolic Response to Short-term Protein Supplementation in Reproductive-Aged Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) (P08-070-19)

Open access
Rao, Manisha, Zumbro, Emily, Dixon, Morgan, Kaiser, Kayleigh, Sebastian, Lily, McAdams, Dreanna, LeMieux, Monique, Broughton, K Shane·2019·Current Developments in Nutrition

Abstract

Women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) are commonly insulin resistant, hyperinsulinemic and hyperglycemic, increasing their risk for development of other metabolic, cardiovascular and reproductive disturbances. Dietary whey protein may attenuate postprandial glycemic excursions due to its effect on the gut-brain axis. The aim of the study is to evaluate 7-day whey protein supplementation on metabolic parameters in young women with PCOS. A repeated measures (RM) design was used. Three women with and six without PCOS (PCO and CON respectively) underwent three 150-min oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT): (i) OGTT without protein preload, (ii) OGTT on first and (iii) seventh day of protein preload. Participants consumed 35 g protein daily with protein intake 30 min before carbohydrate load on the test days. Blood samples collected at −30 (fasting/pre-preload), 0 (pre-glucose), 15, 30, 60, 90, 120 and 150 min of OGTTs were analyzed for glucose, insulin, and incretins. (Participant recruitment, data collection and analyses in progress.) Mixed design RM - MANOVA indicates that day of test and time did not have a significant effect on glucose levels within and between groups (P ≥ .05). However, day (P = .027) and time (P = .047) had a significant impact on insulin concentrations in both, PCO and CON groups. Insulin was significantly higher at 30 min compared to −30 and 0 min timepoints (P = .016 and P = .032 respectively) on the first and seventh days of preload. An insulinogenic response elicited by 35 g protein preload may blunt glycemic responses, moderating them throughout the test period in women with PCOS and age-matched healthy controls. Timing of supplementation may play a vital role in achieving long term glucose homeostasis in PCOS. Texas Woman’s University Research Enhancement Program & Glanbia Nutritionals, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cdn/nzz044.p08-070-19

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rao, M., Zumbro, E., Dixon, M., Kaiser, K., Sebastian, L., McAdams, D., LeMieux, M., & Broughton, K. S.
Affiliations
Texas Woman's University (US)
Venue
Current Developments in Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-06
Volume
3
Pages
nzz044.P08-070-19
ISSN
2475-2991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2982230723
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Developments in Nutrition (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
polycystic ovary syndrome, whey protein supplementation, insulin response, oral glucose tolerance test, postprandial glycemic response, incretins, insulin resistance, glucose homeostasis, gut-brain axis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review