The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Ontogeny of Human Gyrification
Abstract
During development the human cortex changes from a smooth lissencephalic structure to one that is highly convoluted. Increases in the degree of cortical folding are associated with brain size only for the first part of brain growth; during the second half, differences in cortical folding match those of brain size, resulting in no change in the degree of folding. When the degree of cortical folding is studied as a function of age, a brief postnatal overshoot, an effect of brain size, is observed. The analysis suggests that the mechanical hypothesis of cortical buckling can best explain the degree of cortical folding, but that other hypotheses, like gyrogenesis, are required to explain the placement and orientation of sulci. The adult asymptote in degree of cortical folding is associated with the onset and disappearance of single subplate lamina, suggesting that subplate:cortical plate associations should be examined as causal for gyrification. Areas whose sulci differ in length between the two hemispheres have similar degrees of convolutedness, supporting interpretations that the sizes of gyri are asymmetric in the two hemispheres. The ontogenetic data support the thesis that human cortical proportions evolved when the brain enlarged in size and that the process was not one of neoteny.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sawyer, S. M., Azzopardi, P. S., Wickremarathne, D., & Patton, G. C. (2018) · The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/s2352-4642(18)30022-1 · Cited by 3,666
Winkler, A. M., Kochunov, P., Blangero, J., Almasy, L., Zilles, K., Fox, P. T., Duggirala, R., & Glahn, D. C. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.028 · Cited by 1,172
Self-citationBershteyn, M., Nowakowski, T. J., Pollen, A. A., Di Lullo, E., Nene, A., Wynshaw-Boris, A., & Kriegstein, A. R. (2017) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2016.12.007 · Cited by 566
Pantelis, C. (2005) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbi034 · Cited by 573
Defining the phenotype of schizophrenia: cognitive dysmetria and its neural mechanisms
Andreasen, N. C., Nopoulos, P., O’Leary, D. S., Miller, D. D., Wassink, T., & Flaum, M. (1999) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(99)00152-3 · Cited by 560
Metadata
- Authors
- Armstrong, E., Schleicher, A., Omran, H., Curtis, M., & Zilles, K.
- Venue
- Cerebral Cortex
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 56-63
- ISSN
- 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2199
- OpenAlex
- W2062224701
- Cited by
- 644
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Ontogeny of Human Gyrification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/cercor/5.1.56
- The paper
- Armstrong, E., Schleicher, A., Omran, H., Curtis, M., & Zilles, K. (1995). The Ontogeny of Human Gyrification. Cerebral Cortex. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/5.1.56
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.