High dream recall frequency is associated with an increase of both bottom-up and top-down attentional processes
Open accessAbstract
Event-related potentials (ERPs) associated with the involuntary orientation of (bottom-up) attention toward an unexpected sound are of larger amplitude in high dream recallers (HR) than in low dream recallers (LR) during passive listening, suggesting different attentional functioning. We measured bottom-up and top-down attentional performance and their cerebral correlates in 18 HR (11 women, age = 22.7 years, dream recall frequency = 5.3 days with a dream recall per week) and 19 LR (10 women, age = 22.3, DRF = 0.2) using EEG and the Competitive Attention Task. Between-group differences were found in ERPs but not in behavior. The results show that HR present larger ERPs to distracting sounds than LR even during active listening, arguing for enhanced bottom-up processing of irrelevant sounds. HR also presented larger contingent negative variation during target expectancy and P3b to target sounds than LR, speaking for an enhanced recruitment of top-down attention. The attentional balance seems preserved in HR since their performances are not altered, but possibly at a higher resource cost. In HR, increased bottom-up processes would favor dream recall through awakening facilitation during sleep and enhanced top-down processes may foster dream recall through increased awareness and/or short-term memory stability of dream content.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
HR have an increase of neurophysiological markers of bottom-up and top-down attentional processes during wakefulness.
“We also recently evidenced an increase of neurophysiological markers of bottom-up and top-down attentional processes in HR during wakefulness.46”
From High Dream Recall Frequency is Associated with Increased Creativity and Default Mode Network Connectivity (2022) · cites this paper as [46]
HR and LR have a differential neurophysiological profile.
“several other studies of our team evidenced that HR and LR have a differential neurophysiological profile.”
From High Dream Recall Frequency is Associated with Increased Creativity and Default Mode Network Connectivity (2022) · cites this paper as [46]
Cites
What is self-specific? Theoretical investigation and critical review of neuroimaging results
Legrand, D., & Ruby, P. (2009) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0014172 · Cited by 470 · see citing works
Self-citationExperimental research on dreaming: state of the art and neuropsychoanalytic perspectives
Ruby, P. M. (2011) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00286 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Self-citationBEAULIEU‐PRÉVOST, D., & ZADRA, A. (2007) · Journal of Sleep Research · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2869.2007.00572.x · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Vallat, R., Nicolas, A., & Ruby, P. (2020) · Sleep · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsaa116 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Self-citationDream recall frequency is associated with medial prefrontal cortex white-matter density
Vallat, R., Eichenlaub, J.-B., Nicolas, A., & Ruby, P. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01856 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vallat, R., Türker, B., Nicolas, A., & Ruby, P. (2022) · Nature and Science of Sleep · doi:10.2147/nss.s342137 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
“We also recently evidenced an increase of neurophysiological markers of bottom-up and top-down attentional processes in HR during wakefulness.(46) Figure 2 Creativity score in high dream recallers (HR) and low dream recallers (LR).”
Self-citationDream recall frequency is associated with attention rather than with working memory abilities
Blain, S., de la Chapelle, A., Caclin, A., Bidet‐Caulet, A., & Ruby, P. (2022) · Journal of Sleep Research · doi:10.1111/jsr.13557 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Ruby, P., Masson, R., Chatard, B., Hoyer, R., Bottemanne, L., Vallat, R., & Bidet-Caulet, A.
- Affiliations
- Lyon 1 Université (FR)
- Perception, Attention, Memory Team—Lyon Neuroscience Research Center (CRNL), INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR 5292, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Université de Lyon , Lyon 69000, France
- Corresponding author
- Ruby, Perrine
- Venue
- Cerebral Cortex
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2021-12-14
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 3752-3762
- ISSN
- 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2199
- OpenAlex
- W4200503074
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 0.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hal.science
- Licence
- Locations
- Cerebral Cortex (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- French National Research Agency (ANR-14-CE30-0001-01, ANR-11-IDEX-0007)
- LABEX CORTEX (ANR-11-LABX-0042, ANR-10-LABX-0060)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Keywords
- dream recall frequency, bottom-up attention, top-down attention, involuntary attention, event-related potentials, contingent negative variation, P3b, auditory attention
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Auditory Perception, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Memory, Short-Term, Mental Recall, Sleep, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review