The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Anatomy of Spatial Neglect based on Voxelwise Statistical Analysis: A Study of 140 Patients
Abstract
A major challenge for any anatomical study of spatial neglect in neurological patients is that human lesions vary tremendously in extent and location between individuals. Approaches to this problem used in previous studies were to focus on subgroups of patients that are more homogeneous either with respect to the branch territory affected by the stroke or with respect to existing additional neurological symptoms (e.g. additional visual field defects). It could be argued that such strategies might bias the conclusions on the critical substrate associated with spatial neglect. The present study thus addressed the high variability inherent in naturally occurring lesions by using an unselected, but very large sample size and by comparing a neglect group with a non-neglect group using voxelwise statistical testing. We investigated an unselected 7 year sample of 140 consecutively admitted patients with right hemisphere strokes. Seventy-eight had spatial neglect, 62 did not show the disorder. The incidence of visual field defects was comparable in both groups. For assessing lesion location, in a first step, we used conventional lesion density plots together with subtraction analysis. Moreover, due to the large size of the sample voxelwise statistical testing was possible to objectively estimate which brain regions are more frequently compromised in neglect patients relative to patients without neglect. The results demonstrate that the right superior temporal cortex, the insula and subcortically putamen and caudate nucleus are the neural structures damaged significantly more often in patients with spatial neglect.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-3338 · Cited by 35,305
Kupper, L. L., Hosmer, D. W., & Lemeshow, S. (1990) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290035 · Cited by 7,599
Talairach, J., Tournoux, P., & Rayport, M. (1988) · Thieme eBooks · Cited by 5,058
Stereotaxic Display of Brain Lesions
Rorden, C., & Brett, M. (2000) · Behavioural Neurology · doi:10.1155/2000/421719 · Cited by 2,590
The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control
Hopfinger, J. B., Buonocore, M. H., & Mangun, G. R. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/72999 · Cited by 1,876
Voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping
Bates, E., Wilson, S. M., Saygin, A. P., Dick, F., Sereno, M. I., Knight, R. T., & Dronkers, N. F. (2003) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1050 · Cited by 1,457
Visual properties of neurons in a polysensory area in superior temporal sulcus of the macaque.
Bruce, C., Desimone, R., & Gross, C. G. (1981) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1981.46.2.369 · Cited by 1,227
The Bells Test: A quantitative and qualitative test for visual neglect.
Gauthier, L., Dehaut, F., & Joanette, Y. (1989) · The International journal of clinical neuropsychology · Cited by 1,036
Spatial Normalization of Brain Images with Focal Lesions Using Cost Function Masking
Brett, M., Leff, A. P., Rorden, C., & Ashburner, J. (2001) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0845 · Cited by 930
Processing of Complex Sounds in the Macaque Nonprimary Auditory Cortex
Rauschecker, J. P., Tian, B., & Hauser, M. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7701330 · Cited by 929
Cited by
The reorienting system of the human brain: from environment to theory of mind
Corbetta, M., Patel, G., & Shulman, G. L. (2008) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.04.017 · Cited by 3,889
Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex
Hubbard, E. M., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., & Dehaene, S. (2005) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1684 · Cited by 1,247
A lateralized brain network for visuospatial attention
de Schotten, M. T., Dell'Acqua, F., Forkel, S. J., Simmons, A., Vergani, F., Murphy, D. G. M., & Catani, M. (2011) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2905 · Cited by 1,103
Neural basis and recovery of spatial attention deficits in spatial neglect
Corbetta, M., Kincade, M. J., Lewis, C., Snyder, A. Z., & Sapir, A. (2005) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1574 · Cited by 892
Typologies of attentional networks
Raz, A., & Buhle, J. (2006) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1903 · Cited by 706
Metadata
- Authors
- Karnath, H.-O.
- Venue
- Cerebral Cortex
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-04-27
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1164-1172
- ISSN
- 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2199
- OpenAlex
- W2164631992
- Cited by
- 573
- References
- 42
- FWCI
- 14.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Anatomy of Spatial Neglect based on Voxelwise Statistical Analysis: A Study of 140 Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/cercor/bhh076
- The paper
- Karnath, H.-O. (2004). The Anatomy of Spatial Neglect based on Voxelwise Statistical Analysis: A Study of 140 Patients. Cerebral Cortex. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhh076
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.