The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Three-dimensional MRI Atlas of the Mouse Brain with Estimates of the Average and Variability
Open accessAbstract
Although there is growing interest in finding mouse models of human disease, no technique for quickly and quantitatively determining anatomical mutants currently exists. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is ideally suited to probe fine structures in mice. This technology is three-dimensional, non-destructive and rapid compared to histopathology; hence MRI scientists have been able to create detailed three-dimensional images of 60 mum resolution or better. The data is digital which lends itself to sophisticated image processing algorithms. Here we show a variational MRI atlas constructed from nine excised brains of 8 week old 129S1/SvImJ male mice. This new type of atlas is comprised of an unbiased average brain--created from alignment of the individual brains--and the mathematical descriptors of anatomical variation across the individuals. We found that the majority of internal points in the individuals never varied more than 117 microm from equivalent points in the atlas. A three-dimensional annotation of the average image was performed and used to estimate the mean and standard deviation of volumes in a variety of structures across the individual brains; these volumes never differed by more than 5%. Our results indicate that variational atlases of inbred strains represent a well-defined basis against which mutant outliers can be readily compared.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data
Sled, J. G., Zijdenbos, A. P., & Evans, A. C. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/42.668698 · Cited by 4,731
Self-citation
Cited by
Behavioral phenotypes of Disc1 missense mutations in mice
Clapcote, S. J., Lipina, T. V., Millar, J. K., Mackie, S., Christie, S., Ogawa, F., Lerch, J. P., Trimble, K., Uchiyama, M., Sakuraba, Y., et al. (2007) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.04.015 · Cited by 526
Self-citationA high-resolution probabilistic in vivo atlas of human subcortical brain nuclei
Pauli, W. M., Nili, A. N., & Tyszka, J. M. (2018) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/sdata.2018.63 · Cited by 517
Ma, Y., Hof, P. R., Grant, S. C., Blackband, S. J., Bennett, R., Slatest, L., McGuigan, M. D., & Benveniste, H. (2005) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.07.014 · Cited by 437
Blood Oxygen Level-Dependent Signal Variability Is More than Just Noise
Garrett, D. D., Kovacevic, N., McIntosh, A. R., & Grady, C. L. (2010) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5166-09.2010 · Cited by 396
Hua, X., Leow, A. D., Parikshak, N., Lee, S., Chiang, M.-C., Toga, A. W., Jack, C. R., Weiner, M. W., & Thompson, P. M. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.07.013 · Cited by 360
Metadata
- Authors
- Kovačević, N., Henderson, J. T., Chan, E., Lifshitz, N., Bishop, J., Evans, A. C., Henkelman, R. M., & Chen, X. J.
- Venue
- Cerebral Cortex
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-09-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 639-645
- ISSN
- 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2199
- OpenAlex
- W2087328731
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Three-dimensional MRI Atlas of the Mouse Brain with Estimates of the Average and Variability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/cercor/bhh165
- The paper
- Kovačević, N., Henderson, J. T., Chan, E., Lifshitz, N., Bishop, J., Evans, A. C., Henkelman, R. M., & Chen, X. J. (2005). A Three-dimensional MRI Atlas of the Mouse Brain with Estimates of the Average and Variability. Cerebral Cortex. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhh165
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.