Cited by 129Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesNeural dynamics and brain functionNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Enhancement of working memory and task-related oscillatory activity following intermittent theta burst stimulation in healthy controls

Open access
Hoy, Kate E., Bailey, Neil, Michael, Marco, Fitzgibbon, Bernadette, Rogasch, Nigel C., Saeki, Takashi, Fitzgerald, Paul B.·2016·Cerebral Cortex

Abstract

Noninvasive brain stimulation is increasingly being investigated for the enhancement of cognition, yet current approaches appear to be limited in their degree and duration of effects. The majority of studies to date have delivered stimulation in "standard" ways (i.e., anodal transcranial direct current stimulation or high-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation). Specialized forms of stimulation, such as theta burst stimulation (TBS), which more closely mimic the brains natural firing patterns may have greater effects on cognitive performance. We report here the findings from the first-ever investigation into the persistent cognitive and electrophysiological effects of intermittent TBS (iTBS) delivered to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. In 19 healthy controls, active iTBS significantly improved performance on an assessment of working memory when compared with sham stimulation across a period of 40 min post stimulation. The behavioral findings were accompanied by increases in task-related fronto-parietal theta sychronization and parietal gamma band power. These results have implications for the role of more specialized stimulation approaches in neuromodulation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cercor/bhv193

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Amari S, Cichocki A, Yang H. 1996. A new learning algorithm for blind signal separation. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 8:757-763.
  2. Beggs JM, Plenz D. 2003. Neuronal avalanches in neocortical cir- cuits. J Neurosci. 23(35):11167-11177.
  3. Benali A, Trippe J, Weiler E, Mix A, Petrasch-Parwez E, Girzalsky W, Eysel UT, Erdmann R, Funke K. 2011. Theta- burst transcranial magnetic stimulation alters cortical inhib- ition. J Neurosci. 31(4):1193-1203.
  4. Brunoni AR, Vanderhasselt MA. 2014. Working memory improve- ment with non-invasive brain stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Cogn. 86:1-9.
  5. Cazzoli D, Wurtz P, Müri RM, Hess CW, Nyffeler T. 2009. Interhe- mispheric balance of overt attention: a theta burst stimula- tion study. Eur J Neurosci. 29(6):1271-1276.
  6. Delorme A, Makeig S. 2004. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods. 134(1):9-21.
  7. Di Lazzaro V, Pilato F, Dileone M, Profice P, Oliviero A, Mazzone P, Insola A, Ranieri F, Meglio M, Tonali PA, et al. 2008. The physiological basis of the effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex. J Physiol. 586 (16):3871-3879.
  8. Fitzgerald PB, Fountain S, Daskalakis ZJ. 2006. A comprehensive review of the effects of rTMS on motor cortical excitability and inhibition. Clin Neurophysiol. 117(12):2584-2596.
  9. Fitzgerald PB, Maller JJ, Hoy KE, Thomson R, Daskalakis ZJ. 2009. Exploring the optimal site for the localization of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in brain stimulation experiments. Brain Stimul. 2(4):234-237.
  10. Haatveit BC, Sundet K, Hugdahl K, Ueland T, Melle I, Andreassen OA. 2010. The validity of d prime as a working memory index: results from the "Bergen n-back task". J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 32(8):871-880.
  11. Hardmeier M, Hatz F, Bousleiman H, Schindler C, Stam CJ, Fuhr P. 2014. Reproducibility of functional connectivity and graph measures based on the phase lag index (PLI) and weighted phase lag index (wPLI) derived from high resolution EEG. PLoS ONE. 9(10):e108648.
  12. Hauser TU, Rotzer S, Grabner RH, Mérillat S, Jäncke L. 2013. En- hancing performance in numerical magnitude processing and mental arithmetic using transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS). Front Hum Neurosci. 7:244. doi: 10.3389/ fnhum.2013.00244. · DOI
  13. Hecht D, Walsh V, Lavidor M. 2010. Transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates decision making in a probabilistic guessing task. J Neurosci. 30(12):4241-4245.
  14. Hoaglin DC, Iglewicz B. 1987. Fine-tuning some resistant rules for outlier labeling. J Am Stat Assoc. 82(400):1147-1149.
  15. Hoy KE, Arnold SL, Emonson MR, Daskalakis ZJ, Fitzgerald PB. 2014. An investigation into the effects of tDCS dose on cogni- tive performance over time in patients with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 155(1):96-100.
  16. Hoy KE, Emonson MR, Arnold SL, Thomson RH, Daskalakis ZJ, Fitzgerald PB. 2013. Testing the limits: investigating the effect of tDCS dose on working memory enhancement in healthy controls. Neuropsychologia. 51(9):1777-1784.
  17. Hrabetova S, Serrano P, Blace N, Tse HW, Skifter DA, Jane DE, Monaghan DT, Sacktor TC. 2000. Distinct NMDA receptor subpopulations contribute to long-term potenti- ation and long-term depression induction. J Neurosci. 20 (12):81-6.
  18. Huang YZ, Chen RS, Rothwell JC, Wen HY. 2007. The after-effect of human theta burst stimulation is NMDA receptor dependent. Clin Neurophysiol. 118(5):1028-1032.
  19. Huang YZ, Edwards MJ, Rounis E, Bhatia KP, Rothwell JC. 2005. Theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex. Neuron. 45(2):201-206.
  20. Krause B, Márquez-Ruiz J, Kadosh RC. 2013. The effect of transcra- nial direct current stimulation: a role for cortical excitation/ inhibition balance? Front Hum Neurosci. 7:602. doi: 10.3389/ fnhum.2013.00602. · DOI
  21. Lisman J. 2010. Working memory: the importance of theta and gamma oscillations. Curr Biol. 20(11):R490-R492.
  22. Morgan HM, Jackson MC, van Koningsbruggen MG, Shapiro KL, Linden DE. 2013. Frontal and parietal theta burst TMS impairs working memory for visual-spatial conjunctions. Brain Stimul. 6(2):122-129.
  23. Oberman L, Edwards D, Eldaief M, Pascual-Leone A. 2011. Safety of theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation: a systematic review of the literature. J Clin Neurophysiol. 28(1):67.
  24. Oostenveld R, Fries P, Maris E, Schoffelen J. 2011. FieldTrip: open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and inva- sive electrophysiological data. Comput Intell Neurosci. 9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/156869. · DOI · Paper page
  25. Rossi S, Rossini PM. 2004. TMS in cognitive plasticity and the po- tential for rehabilitation. Trends Cogn Sci. 8(6):273-279.
  26. Rounis E, Maniscalco B, Rothwell JC, Passingham RE, Lau H. 2010. Theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation to the pre- frontal cortex impairs metacognitive visual awareness. Cogn Neurosci. 1(3):165-175.
  27. Sarnthein J, Petsche H, Rappelsberger P, Shaw GL, Von Stein A. 1998. Synchronization between prefrontal and posterior asso- ciation cortex during human working memory. PNAS. 95 (12):7092-7096.
  28. Sauseng P, Griesmayr B, Freunberger R, Klimesch W. 2010. Control mechanisms in working memory: a possible function of EEG theta oscillations. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 34(7):1015-1022.
  29. Sederberg PB, Kahana MJ, Howard MW, Donner EJ, Madsen JR. 2003. Theta and gamma oscillations during encoding predict subsequent recall. J Neurosci. 23(34):10809-10814.
  30. Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, Janavs J, Weiller E, Keskiner A, Schinka J, Knapp E, Sheehan MF, Dunbar GC. 1997. The validity of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) according to the SCID-P and its reliability. Eur Psychiatry. 12(5):232-241.
  31. Shew WL, Yang H, Yu S, Roy R, Plenz D. 2011. Information cap- acity and transmission are maximized in balanced cortical networks with neuronal avalanches. J Neurosci. 31(1):55-63.
  32. Thut G, Veniero D, Romei V, Miniussi C, Schyns P, Gross J. 2011. Rhythmic TMS causes local entrainment of natural oscillatory signatures. Curr Biol. 21(14):1176-1185.
  33. Verbruggen F, Aron AR, Stevens MA, Chambers CD. 2010. Theta burst stimulation dissociates attention and action updating in human inferior frontal cortex. PNAS. 107(31):13966-13971.
  34. Vinck M, Oostenveld R, van Wingerden M, Battaglia F, Pennartz CM. 2011. An improved index of phase-synchroniza- tion for electrophysiological data in the presence of volume- conduction, noise and sample-size bias. Neuroimage. 55 (4):1548-1565.
  35. Yizhar O, Fenno LE, Prigge M, Schneider F, Davidson TJ, O'Shea DJ, Sohal VS, Goshen I, Finkelstein J, Paz JT, et al. 2011. Neocortical excitation/inhibition balance in information processing and social dysfunction. Nature. 477(7363):171-178.

Authors
Hoy, K. E., Bailey, N., Michael, M., Fitzgibbon, B., Rogasch, N. C., Saeki, T., & Fitzgerald, P. B.
Affiliations
  • The Alfred Hospital (AU)
  • Monash University (AU)
Corresponding author
Hoy, Kate E.
Venue
Cerebral Cortex
Published
2015-09-23
Volume
26
Issue
12
Pages
4563-4573
ISSN
  • 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2199
OpenAlex
W2337709795
Cited by
129
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4
FWCI
3.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cerebral Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
  • Monash University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
intermittent theta burst stimulation, working memory, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, non-invasive brain stimulation, neuromodulation, theta synchronization, gamma power, cognitive enhancement, sham stimulation
MeSH terms
Cortical Synchronization, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Neuropsychological Tests, Parietal Lobe, Reaction Time, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Theta Rhythm, Single-Blind Method, Prefrontal Cortex, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Young Adult, Gamma Rhythm

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review