The DOI matches its Crossref record.
'Microsmatic' Primates Revisited: Olfactory Sensitivity in the Squirrel Monkey
Open accessAbstract
Using a conditioning paradigm, the olfactory sensitivity of three squirrel monkeys to nine odorants representing different chemical classes as well as members of a homologous series of substances was investigated. The animals significantly discriminated dilutions as low as 1:10,000 n-propionic acid, 1:30,000 n-butanoic acid and n-pentanoic acid, 1:100,000 n-hexanoic acid, 1:1Mio n-heptanoic acid, 1:30, 000 1-pentanol, 1:300,000 1,8-cineole, 1:1Mio n-heptanal and 1:30Mio amyl acetate from the near-odorless solvent, with single individuals scoring even slightly better. The results showed (i) the squirrel monkey to have an unexpectedly high olfactory sensitivity, which for some substances matches or even is better than that of species such as the rat or the dog, and (ii) a significant negative correlation between perceptibility in terms of olfactory detection thresholds and carbon chain length of carboxylic acids. These findings support the assumptions that olfaction may play a significant and hitherto underestimated role in the regulation of primate behavior, and that the concept of primates as primarily visual and 'microsmatic' animals needs to be revised.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Electronic Nose: Current Status and Future Trends
Röck, F., Barsan, N., & Weimar, U. (2008) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr068121q · Cited by 1,437
The evolution of animal chemosensory receptor gene repertoires: roles of chance and necessity
Nei, M., Niimura, Y., & Nozawa, M. (2008) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2480 · Cited by 621
Odor Coding by a Mammalian Receptor Repertoire
Saito, H., Chi, Q., Zhuang, H., Matsunami, H., & Mainland, J. D. (2009) · Science Signaling · doi:10.1126/scisignal.2000016 · Cited by 572
Poor human olfaction is a 19th-century myth
McGann, J. P. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aam7263 · Cited by 500
The Human Sense of Smell: Are We Better Than We Think?
Shepherd, G. M. (2004) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020146 · Cited by 297
Metadata
- Authors
- Laska, M.
- Venue
- Chemical Senses
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-02-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 47-53
- ISSN
- 0379-864X (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3553
- OpenAlex
- W2165855379
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 'Microsmatic' Primates Revisited: Olfactory Sensitivity in the Squirrel Monkey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/chemse/25.1.47
- The paper
- Laska, M. (2000). 'Microsmatic' Primates Revisited: Olfactory Sensitivity in the Squirrel Monkey. Chemical Senses. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/25.1.47
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.