The DOI matches its Crossref record.
New Seasonings
Abstract
The relationship between our senses and chemistry is a most interesting issue from several points of view. Among the senses, olfaction and taste are regarded as the chemical senses proper. It is clear, therefore, that there must be a close relationship between the chemical structure of a substance and its smell and taste. However, I regret to say, little scientific evidence has been obtained for this relationship. (...) In the past it was said that there are five taste qualities: sour, sweet, salty, bitter and hot. A hot sensation is just a skin mechanical sensation, therefore today's scientists do not regard this sensation as a taste. Furthermore, such qualities as metallic, alkaline and astringent are not considered to be tastes (at least not pure tastes), because they cannot be separated from the sensation accompanied by tissue damage. Therefore, Physiologists and psychologists recognize only the four tastes sour, sweet, salty and bitter. Other tastes are considered to be a mixture of these tastes. However, I believe that there is at least one other additional taste which is quite distinct from the four tastes. It is the peculiar taste which we feel as `UMAI [meaning brothy, meaty, or savory]', arising from fish, meat and so forth. The taste is most characteristic of broth prepared from dried bonito and seaweed [Laminaria japonica]. While it is based on a subjective sensation, many people who are asked always agree to this conjecture either immediately or after brief consideration. Consequently, there can be little doubt that another taste exists in addition to the four tastes. I propose to call this taste `UMAMI' for convenience.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The receptors and cells for mammalian taste
Chandrashekar, J., Hoon, M. A., Ryba, N. J. P., & Zuker, C. S. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05401 · Cited by 1,621
The Effects of Advertising Copy on Sensory Thoughts and Perceived Taste
Elder, R. S., & Krishna, A. (2010) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/605327 · Cited by 350
Algae as Food in Europe: An Overview of Species Diversity and Their Application
Mendes, M., Navalho, S., Ferreira, A., Paulino, C., Figueiredo, D., Silva, D., Gao, F., Gama, F., Bombo, G., Jacinto, R., et al. (2022) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods11131871 · Cited by 234
Metadata
- Authors
- Ikeda, K.
- Venue
- Chemical Senses
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-11-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 847-849
- ISSN
- 0379-864X (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3553
- OpenAlex
- W4245407134
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New Seasonings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/chemse/27.9.847
- The paper
- Ikeda, K. (2002). New Seasonings. Chemical Senses. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/27.9.847
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.