Cited by 45Face Recognition and PerceptionOlfactory and Sensory Function StudiesEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

Fear Odor Facilitates the Detection of Fear Expressions Over Other Negative Expressions

Open access
Kamiloğlu, Roza G, Smeets, Monique A M, de Groot, Jasper H B, Semin, Gün R·2018·Chemical Senses

Abstract

In a double-blind experiment, participants were exposed to facial images of anger, disgust, fear, and neutral expressions under 2 body odor conditions: fear and neutral sweat. They had to indicate the valence of the gradually emerging facial image. Two alternative hypotheses were tested, namely a "general negative evaluative state" hypothesis and a "discrete emotion" hypothesis. These hypotheses suggest 2 distinctive data patterns for muscle activation and classification speed of facial expressions. The pattern of results that would support a "discrete emotions perspective" would be expected to reveal significantly increased activity in the medial frontalis (eyebrow raiser) and corrugator supercilii (frown) muscles associated with fear, and significantly decreased reaction times (RTs) to "only" fear faces in the fear odor condition. Conversely, a pattern of results characterized by only a significantly increased corrugator supercilii activity together with decreased RTs for fear, disgust, and anger faces in the fear odor condition would support an interpretation in line with a general negative evaluative state perspective. The data support the discrete emotion account for facial affect perception primed with fear odor. This study provides a first demonstration of perception of discrete negative facial expressions using olfactory priming.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/chemse/bjy029

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous research by the authors' group found that receivers exposed to donors' odor displayed a simulacrum in their facial expressions of the emotion experienced by the donors.

    “In previous research by our group, the emotional signal in the sweat volatiles was validated by the finding that receivers exposed to donors’ odor displayed a simulacrum in their facial expressions of the emotion experienced by the donors [1,8,25,26,27,28]”

    From Chemical Fingerprints of Emotional Body Odor (2020) · cites this paper as [26]

  • The order of emotion induction sessions was not random; sessions always started with fear and ended with neutral.

    “Following previous research [1,8,26,27,28], and for reasons explained in the Methods section, the order of sessions was not random, always starting with fear and ending with neutral.”

    From Chemical Fingerprints of Emotional Body Odor (2020) · cites this paper as [26]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kamiloğlu, R. G., Smeets, M. A. M., de Groot, J. H. B., & Semin, G. R.
Affiliations
  • Department of Social, Health and Organizational Psychology, Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Utrecht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Semin, Gün R
Venue
Chemical Senses
Published
2018-05-22
Volume
43
Issue
6
Pages
419-426
ISSN
  • 0379-864X (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3553
OpenAlex
W2804393213
Cited by
45
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
3.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Chemical Senses (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • PubMed
Funders
  • Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia
  • Portuguese Science Foundation (IF/00085/2013)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
facial expression perception, fear expression, disgust, anger, negative emotions, discrete emotions, facial muscle activity, corrugator supercilii, reaction time
MeSH terms
Double-Blind Method, Facial Expression, Fear, Humans, Odorants, Sweat

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review