The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Validated high performance liquid chromatographic technique for determination of 5- fluorouracil: applications to stability studies and simulated colonic media
Abstract
A simple isocratic stability-indicating high-performance liquid chromatographic method with UV detection using thymine as an internal standard is developed. The method is validated and the degradation products are determined. The method is applied for the assessment of the stability of 5-fluorouracil in rat caecal content as a simulated colon medium under anaerobic conditions. The drug decomposes under acidic, alkaline, thermal, and oxidative stress. The drug is highly susceptible to acidic, alkaline, and oxidative hydrolysis as compared to alkaline conditions. Separation of the drug from major and minor degradation products is successfully achieved on a C(18) analytical, micro-bondapak column. The detection wavelength is 260 nm. The method is validated, and the response is found to be linear in the drug concentration range of 0.1-2.0 microg/mL. The high linearity of the standard calibration curve of 5-fluorouracil in the rat content is found to be R(2) = 0.998 in the concentration range from 0.5 to 5 microg/mL. No degradation occurred after incubation of 5-fluorouracil in the rat caecal contents. The standard deviation and coefficient of variation values for intra- and inter-day precision study exhibit acceptable accuracy and precision data throughout the concentration range investigated.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The amount of 5-FU in the investigated samples was quantified using an HPLC method (Alanazi et al., 2009)”
From The use of chitosan-coated flexible liposomes as a remarkable carrier to enhance the antitumor efficacy of 5-fluorouracil against colorectal cancer (2019) · cites this paper as Alanazi et al., 2009
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Alomrani, A., Badran, M., Harisa, G. I., ALshehry, M., Alhariri, M., Alshamsan, A., & Alkholief, M. (2019) · Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.jsps.2019.02.008 · Cited by 143
Metadata
- Authors
- Alanazi, F. K., Eldeen Yassin, A., El-Badry, M., Mowafy, H. A., & Alsarra, I. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Chromatographic Science
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-08-01
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 558-563
- ISSN
- 0021-9665
- 1945-239X
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review