Cited by 25Chromatography in Natural ProductsMicrobial Natural Products and BiosynthesisAnalytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals

Application of Optimized and Validated Agar Overlay TLC–Bioautography Assay for Detecting the Antimicrobial Metabolites of Pharmaceutical Interest

Nuthan, Bettadapura Rameshgowda, Rakshith, Devaraju, Marulasiddaswamy, Kuppuru Mallikarjunaiah, Rao, H C Yashavantha, Ramesha, Kolathur Puttamadaiah, Mohana, Nagabhushana Chandra, Siddappa, Shiva, Darshan, Doreraj +2 more·2020·Journal of Chromatographic Science

Abstract

The agar overlay TLC-bioautography is one of the crucial methods for simultaneous in situ detection and separation of antimicrobial metabolites of pharmaceutical interest. The main focus of this research relies on the dereplication of an antimicrobial metabolite coriloxin derived from mycoendophytic Xylaria sp. NBRTSB-20 with a validation of agar overlay TLC-bioautography technique. This polyketide metabolite coriloxin was purified by column chromatography, and its purity was assessed by HPLC, UPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS, FT-IR and NMR spectral analysis. The antimicrobial capability of ethyl acetate extract and the purified compound coriloxin was determined by disc diffusion, minimal inhibitory concentration and agar overlay TLC-bioautography assay. The visible LOD of coriloxin antimicrobial activity was found at 10 μg for Escherichia coli and 20 μg for both Staphylococcus aureus and Fusarium oxysporum. Inter- and intra-day precision was determined as the relative standard deviation is less than 6.56%, which proved that this method was precise. The accuracy was expressed as recovery, and the values were found ranging from 91.18 to 108.73% with RSD values 0.94-2.30%, respectively. The overall findings of this investigation suggest that agar overlay TLC-bioautography assay is a suitable and acceptable method for the in situ determination of antimicrobial pharmaceuticals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/chromsci/bmaa045

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nuthan, B. R., Rakshith, D., Marulasiddaswamy, K. M., Rao, H. C. Y., Ramesha, K. P., Mohana, N. C., Siddappa, S., Darshan, D., Kumara, K. K. S., & Satish, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Mysore (IN)
  • Indian Institute of Science Bangalore (IN)
  • Central Food Technological Research Institute (IN)
  • Davangere University (IN)
Corresponding author
Satish, Sreedharamurthy
Venue
Journal of Chromatographic Science
Published
2020-08-07
Volume
58
Issue
8
Pages
737-746
ISSN
  • 0021-9665 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-239X
OpenAlex
W3048131226
Cited by
25
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2
FWCI
2.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Chromatographic Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MyPrints@UOM (Mysore University Library) (acceptedVersion)
  • NOT FOUND REPOSITORY (Indian Institute of Science Bangalore) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
  • Indian Council of Medical Research
  • University of Mysore
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Chromatography in Natural Products
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
Keywords
antimicrobial metabolites, dereplication, Xylaria, polyketide metabolites, method validation, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Fusarium oxysporum, minimum inhibitory concentration, drug metabolites
MeSH terms
Agar, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Ascomycota, Bacteria, Biological Assay, Biological Products, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Chromatography, Thin Layer, Fusarium, Reproducibility of Results, Linear Models, Limit of Detection, Endophytes, Polyketides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review