Cited by 16Analytical chemistry methods developmentPesticide Residue Analysis and SafetyAnalytical Chemistry and Chromatography

Determination of Parabens in Beverage Samples by Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction Based on Solidification of Floating Organic Droplet

Hou, Fang, Deng, Xiaoying, Jiang, Xinyu, Yu, Jingang·2014·Journal of Chromatographic Science

Abstract

A simple and efficient method for dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction of methylparaben, ethylparaben, propylparaben and butylparaben in real beverage samples was developed. It is making use of solidified floating organic droplets of 1-dodecanol which has low density and a proper melting point. Parameters influencing the extraction efficiency, such as the type of extraction and dispersive solvent, the volume of extraction and dispersive solvent, salt effect, pH, extraction time, were optimized and resulted in enrichment factors (EFs) of 84 for methylparaben, 103 for ethylparaben, 115 for propylparaben and 126 for butylparaben. The limits of detection for parabens were 1.52, 1.06, 0.32 and 0.17 ng/mL, respectively. Excellent linearity with coefficients of correlation from 0.9970 to 0.9997 was observed in the concentration range of 5-1,000 ng/mL. The repeatability of the proposed method expressed as relative standard deviations (RSDs) ranged from 2.54 to 3.89% (n = 5). The relative recoveries for parabens in beverage samples were good and in the ranges of 89.8-109.9, 90.2-107.3, 90.9-101.7 and 92.3-118.1%, respectively. Thus, the proposed method has excellent potential for the determination of parabens in beverage samples.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/chromsci/bmt175

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hou, F., Deng, X., Jiang, X., & Yu, J.
Affiliations
Central South University (CN)
Corresponding author
Jiang, Xinyu
Venue
Journal of Chromatographic Science
Published
2013-12-01
Volume
52
Issue
10
Pages
1332-1338
ISSN
  • 0021-9665 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-239X
OpenAlex
W2119525277
Cited by
16
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Chromatographic Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (21176262)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
Keywords
parabens, methylparaben, ethylparaben, propylparaben, butylparaben, dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction, solidification of floating organic droplet, 1-dodecanol, beverages, preservative analysis, food additive residues
MeSH terms
Beverages, Chromatography, Liquid, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Parabens, Sodium Chloride, Reproducibility of Results, Linear Models, Limit of Detection, Liquid Phase Microextraction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review