Evidence of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Reinfection After Recovery from Mild Coronavirus Disease 2019
Open accessAbstract
Background: Positive results from real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) in recovered patients raise concern that patients who recover from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may be at risk of reinfection. Currently, however, evidence that supports reinfection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has not been reported. Methods: We conducted whole-genome sequencing of the viral RNA from clinical specimens at the initial infection and at the positive retest from 6 patients who recovered from COVID-19 and retested positive for SARS-CoV-2 via rRT-PCR after recovery. A total of 13 viral RNAs from the patients’ respiratory specimens were consecutively obtained, which enabled us to characterize the difference in viral genomes between initial infection and positive retest. Results: At the time of the positive retest, we were able to acquire a complete genome sequence from patient 1, a 21-year-old previously healthy woman. In this patient, through the phylogenetic analysis, we confirmed that the viral RNA of positive retest was clustered into a subgroup distinct from that of the initial infection, suggesting that there was a reinfection of SARS-CoV-2 with a subtype that was different from that of the primary strain. The spike protein D614G substitution that defines the clade “G” emerged in reinfection, while mutations that characterize the clade “V” (ie, nsp6 L37F and ORF3a G251V) were present at initial infection. Conclusions: Reinfection with a genetically distinct SARS-CoV-2 strain may occur in an immunocompetent patient shortly after recovery from mild COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 infection may not confer immunity against a different SARS-CoV-2 strain.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reinfection can be common in settings where escape variants such as beta (B.1.351), gamma (P.1), and delta (B.1.617.2) are present.
“Because reinfection can be common in settings where escape variants such as beta (B.1.351), gamma (P.1), and delta (B.1.617.2) are present,28, 29, 30”
From Estimating global, regional, and national daily and cumulative infections with SARS-CoV-2 through Nov 14, 2021: a statistical analysis (2022) · cites this paper as [30]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 73
- Authors
- Lee, J.-S., Kim, S. Y., Kim, T. S., Hong, K. H., Ryoo, N.-H., Lee, J., Park, J. H., Cho, S. I., Kim, M. J., Kim, Y.-G., Kim, B., Shin, H. S., Oh, H. S., Seo, M.-S., Gwon, T.-R., Kim, Y., Park, J.-S., Chin, B. S., Park, W. B., Park, S. S., & Seong, M.-W.
- Affiliations
- Seoul National University (KR)
- National Medical Center (KR)
- Seoul Medical Center (KR)
- Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Seong, Moon-Woo
- ORCID
- Venue
- Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2020-11-21
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- e3002-e3008
- ISSN
- 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6591
- PMC
- PMC7890673
- OpenAlex
- W3099037064
- Cited by
- 73
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 2.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
- Keywords
- SARS-CoV-2 reinfection, COVID-19 pandemic, whole genome sequencing, viral genome comparison, phylogenetic analysis, loss of immunity, immunocompetent patient
- MeSH terms
- Reinfection, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adult, Female, Humans, Phylogeny, RNA, Viral, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review