Cited by 155

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evidence-based Guideline for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Vancomycin: 2020 Update by the Division of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, Chinese Pharmacological Society

He, Na, Su, Shan, Ye, Zhikang, Du, Guanhua, He, Bei, Li, Dakui, Liu, Youning, Yang, Kehu, Zhang, Xianglin, Zhang, Yingyuan, Chen, Xiao, Chen, Yaolong, Chen, Zhigang, Dong, Yalin, Du, Guang, Gu, Jian, Guo, Daihong, Guo, Ruichen, Hu, Xin, Jiao, Zheng, Li, Huande, Liu, Gaolin, Li, Zhiping, Lv, Yuan, Lu, Wei, Miao, Liyan, Qu, Jieming, Sun, Tieying, Tong, Rongsheng, Wang, Li, Wang, Minggui, Wang, Rui, Wen, Aidong, Wu, Jiuhong, Wu, Xin’an, Xu, Yingchun, Yang, Yong, Yang, Fan, Zhan, Siyan, Zhang, Bikui, Zhang, Chao, Zhang, Huizhi, Zhang, Jie, Zhang, Jing, Zhang, Jun, Zhang, Wenting, Zhao, Libo, Zhao, Limei, Zhao, Rongsheng, Zhao, Wei, Zhao, Zhigang, Zhou, Wei, Zeng, Xian-Tao, Zhai, Suodi·2020·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

Background: Clinical practice guidelines or recommendations often require timely and regular updating as new evidence emerges, because this can alter the risk-benefit trade-off. The scientific process of developing and updating guidelines accompanied by adequate implementation can improve outcomes. To promote better management of patients receiving vancomycin therapy, we updated the guideline for the therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of vancomycin published in 2015. Methods: Our updated recommendations complied with standards for developing trustworthy guidelines, including timeliness and rigor of the updating process, as well as the use of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. We also followed the methodology handbook published by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence and the Spanish National Health System. Results: We partially updated the 2015 guideline. Apart from adults, the updated guideline also focuses on pediatric patients and neonates requiring intravenous vancomycin therapy. The guideline recommendations involve a broadened range of patients requiring TDM, modified index of TDM (both 24-hour area under the curve and trough concentration), addition regarding the necessity and timing of repeated TDM, and initial dose for specific subpopulations. Overall, 1 recommendation was deleted and 3 recommendations were modified. Eleven new recommendations were added, and no recommendation was made for 2 clinical questions. Conclusions: We updated an evidence-based guideline regarding the TDM of vancomycin using a rigorous and multidisciplinary approach. The updated guideline provides more comprehensive recommendations to inform rational and optimized vancomycin use and is thus of greater applicability.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cid/ciaa1536

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Ye, 2013, Benefits of therapeutic drug monitoring of vancomycin: a systematic review and meta-analysis, PLoS One, 8, e77169, 10.1371/journal.pone.0077169 · DOI
  2. Ye, 2016, Therapeutic drug monitoring of vancomycin: a guideline of the Division of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, Chinese Pharmacological Society, J Antimicrob Chemother, 71, 3020, 10.1093/jac/dkw254 · DOI
  3. Shekelle, 2018, Clinical practice guidelines: what’s next?, JAMA, 320, 757, 10.1001/jama.2018.9660 · DOI
  4. Vernooij, 2014, Guidance for updating clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review of methodological handbooks, Implement Sci, 9, 3, 10.1186/1748-5908-9-3 · DOI
  5. He, 2020, The benefit of individualized vancomycin dosing via pharmacokinetic tools: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Ann Pharmacother, 54, 331, 10.1177/1060028019887363 · DOI
  6. Heil, 2018, Making the change to area under the curve–based vancomycin dosing, Am J Health Syst Pharm, 75, 1986, 10.2146/ajhp180034 · DOI
  7. Manian, 2017, Should we revisit the nephrotoxic potential of piperacillin-tazobactam as well?, Clin Infect Dis, 65, 178, 10.1093/cid/cix321 · DOI
  8. Liu, 2019, Progress in development and application of decision-making systems for individualized dosing, Chinese Pharm J, 54, 1
  9. Ye, 2016, A protocol for developing a clinical practice guideline for therapeutic drug monitoring of vancomycin, J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci, 36, 469, 10.1007/s11596-016-1610-y · DOI
  10. Institute of Medicine Committee on Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines., 2011, Clinical practice guidelines we can trust
  11. Guyatt, 2008, Going from evidence to recommendations, BMJ, 336, 1049, 10.1136/bmj.39493.646875.AE · DOI · Paper page
  12. Matsumoto, 2013, Practice guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring of vancomycin: a consensus review of the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and the Japanese Society of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, J Infect Chemother, 19, 365, 10.1007/s10156-013-0599-4 · DOI
  13. Chen, 2018, Individualized medication of voriconazole: a practice guideline of the division of therapeutic drug monitoring, Chinese Pharmacological Society, Ther Drug Monit, 40, 663, 10.1097/FTD.0000000000000561 · DOI
  14. Chen, 2017, A reporting tool for practice guidelines in health care: the RIGHT statement, Ann Intern Med, 166, 128, 10.7326/M16-1565 · DOI
  15. Vernooij, 2017, Reporting items for updated clinical guidelines: checklist for the reporting of updated guidelines (CheckUp), PLoS Med, 14, e1002207, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002207 · DOI
  16. Kalligeros, 2019, The association of acute kidney injury with the concomitant use of vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 63, e01572-19, 10.1128/AAC.01572-19 · DOI
  17. Cook, 2019, Augmented renal clearance, Pharmacotherapy, 39, 346, 10.1002/phar.2231 · DOI
  18. Bilbao-Meseguer, 2018, Augmented renal clearance in critically ill patients: a systematic review, Clin Pharmacokinet, 57, 1107, 10.1007/s40262-018-0636-7 · DOI
  19. Finch, 2017, A quasi-experiment to study the impact of vancomycin area under the concentration-time curve-guided dosing on vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity, Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 61, e01293-17, 10.1128/AAC.01293-17 · DOI
  20. Meng, 2019, Conversion from vancomycin trough concentration-guided dosing to area under the curve-guided dosing using two sample measurements in adults: implementation at an academic medical center, Pharmacotherapy, 39, 433, 10.1002/phar.2234 · DOI
  21. Neely, 2018, Prospective trial on the use of trough concentration versus area under the curve to determine therapeutic vancomycin dosing, Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 62, e02042-17, 10.1128/AAC.02042-17 · DOI
  22. Olson, 2020, Intravenous vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring in children: evaluation of a pharmacy-driven protocol and collaborative practice agreement, J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc, 9, 334, 10.1093/jpids/piz036 · DOI
  23. Liang, 2018, A prospective multicenter clinical observational study on vancomycin efficiency and safety with therapeutic drug monitoring, Clin Infect Dis, 67, 249, 10.1093/cid/ciy680 · DOI
  24. Jian, 2020, Dynamic changes of Staphylococcus aureus susceptibility to vancomycin, teicoplanin, and linezolid in a central teaching hospital in Shanghai, China, 2008–2018, Front Microbiol, 11, 908, 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00908 · DOI
  25. Aljefri, 2019, Vancomycin area under the curve and acute kidney injury: a meta-analysis, Clin Infect Dis, 69, 1881, 10.1093/cid/ciz051 · DOI
  26. Zhang, 2020, Therapeutic drug monitoring coupled with bayesian forecasting could prevent vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity in renal insufficiency patients: a prospective study and pharmacoeconomic analysis, Ther Drug Monit, 42, 600, 10.1097/FTD.0000000000000750 · DOI
  27. Demirjian, 2013, A randomized controlled trial of a vancomycin loading dose in children, Pediatr Infect Dis J, 32, 1217, 10.1097/INF.0b013e3182a26774 · DOI
  28. Rosini, 2015, A randomized trial of loading vancomycin in the emergency department, Ann Pharmacother, 49, 6, 10.1177/1060028014556813 · DOI
  29. Zhang, 2016, The influence of different dosage and administration route of vancomycin on trough concentration and clinical efficacy of severe sepsis. Master’s thesis
  30. Alvarez, 2017, Pharmacokinetic assessment of vancomycin loading dose in critically ill patients, Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 61, e00280-17, 10.1128/AAC.00280-17 · DOI
  31. Truong, 2012, Simple approach to improving vancomycin dosing in intensive care: a standardised loading dose results in earlier therapeutic levels, Intern Med J, 42, 23, 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2011.02459.x · DOI
  32. Dao, 2019, Optimisation of vancomycin exposure in neonates based on the best level of evidence, Pharmacol Res, 154, 104278, 10.1016/j.phrs.2019.104278 · DOI
  33. Zhao, 2020, Vancomycin dosing regimen in patients with renal insufficiency: a systematic review, Chin J Clin Pharmacol, 36, 573
  34. Thomson, 2009, Development and evaluation of vancomycin dosage guidelines designed to achieve new target concentrations, J Antimicrob Chemother, 63, 1050, 10.1093/jac/dkp085 · DOI
  35. Rybak, 2020, Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin for serious methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: a revised consensus guideline and review by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists, Am J Health Syst Pharm, 77, 835, 10.1093/ajhp/zxaa036 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
He, N., Su, S., Ye, Z., Du, G., He, B., Li, D., Liu, Y., Yang, K., Zhang, X., Zhang, Y., Chen, X., Chen, Y., Chen, Z., Dong, Y., Du, G., Gu, J., Guo, D., Guo, R., Hu, X., Jiao, Z., Li, H., Liu, G., Li, Z., Lv, Y., Lu, W., Miao, L., Qu, J., Sun, T., Tong, R., Wang, L., Wang, M., Wang, R., Wen, A., Wu, J., Wu, X., Xu, Y., Yang, Y., Yang, F., Zhan, S., Zhang, B., Zhang, C., Zhang, H., Zhang, J., Zhang, J., Zhang, J., Zhang, W., Zhao, L., Zhao, L., Zhao, R., Zhao, W., Zhao, Z., Zhou, W., Zeng, X.-T., & Zhai, S.
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2020-11-15
Volume
71
Issue
Supplement_4
Pages
S363-S371
ISSN
  • 1058-4838
  • 1537-6591
Cited by
155
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review