Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 380

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Efficacy of Ceftazidime-avibactam Plus Aztreonam in Patients With Bloodstream Infections Caused by Metallo-β-lactamase–Producing Enterobacterales

Falcone, Marco, Daikos, George L, Tiseo, Giusy, Bassoulis, Dimitrios, Giordano, Cesira, Galfo, Valentina, Leonildi, Alessandro, Tagliaferri, Enrico, Barnini, Simona, Sani, Spartaco, Farcomeni, Alessio, Ghiadoni, Lorenzo, Menichetti, Francesco·2021·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

Background: In vitro data support the use of combination of aztreonam (ATM) with ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI), but clinical studies are lacking. The aim of our study was to compare the outcome of patients with bloodstream infections (BSIs) due to metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)–producing Enterobacterales treated either with CAZ-AVI plus ATM or other active antibiotics (OAAs). Methods: This was a prospective observational study including patients admitted to 3 hospitals in Italy and Greece. The primary outcome measure was 30-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were clinical failure at day 14 and length of stay after BSI diagnosis. Cox regression analysis including a propensity score (PS) for receiving CAZ-AVI + ATM was performed to evaluate primary and secondary outcomes. A PS-based matched analysis was also performed. Results: We enrolled 102 patients with BSI; 82 had infections caused by NDM-producing (79 Klebsiella pneumoniae and 3 Escherichia coli) and 20 by VIM-producing (14 K. pneumoniae, 5 Enterobacter species, 1 Morganella morganii) strains. The 30-day mortality rate was 19.2% in the CAZ-AVI + ATM group vs 44% in the OAA group (P = .007). The PS-adjusted analysis showed that the use of CAZ-AVI + ATM was associated with lower 30-day mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.37 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .13–.74]; P = .01), lower clinical failure at day 14 (HR, 0.30 [95% CI, .14–.65]; P = .002), and shorter length of stay (subdistributional HR, 0.49 [95% CI, .30–.82]; P = .007). The PS-matched analysis confirmed these findings. Conclusions: The CAZ-AVI + ATM combination offers a therapeutic advantage compared to OAAs for patients with BSI due to MBL-producing Enterobacterales. Further studies are warranted.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cid/ciaa586

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

See all 380

Metadata

Authors
Falcone, M., Daikos, G. L., Tiseo, G., Bassoulis, D., Giordano, C., Galfo, V., Leonildi, A., Tagliaferri, E., Barnini, S., Sani, S., Farcomeni, A., Ghiadoni, L., & Menichetti, F.
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2020-05-19
Volume
72
Issue
11
Pages
1871-1878
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W3026777707
Cited by
380
References
23
FWCI
12.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficacy of Ceftazidime-avibactam Plus Aztreonam in Patients With Bloodstream Infections Caused by Metallo-β-lactamase–Producing Enterobacterales. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/cid/ciaa586
The paper
Falcone, M., Daikos, G. L., Tiseo, G., Bassoulis, D., Giordano, C., Galfo, V., Leonildi, A., Tagliaferri, E., Barnini, S., Sani, S., Farcomeni, A., Ghiadoni, L., & Menichetti, F. (2021). Efficacy of Ceftazidime-avibactam Plus Aztreonam in Patients With Bloodstream Infections Caused by Metallo-β-lactamase–Producing Enterobacterales. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa586

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.