Ibrexafungerp Versus Placebo for Vulvovaginal Candidiasis Treatment: A Phase 3, Randomized, Controlled Superiority Trial (VANISH 303)
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Current treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) is largely limited to azole therapy. Ibrexafungerp is a first-in-class triterpenoid antifungal with broad-spectrum anti-Candida fungicidal activity. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ibrexafungerp compared with placebo in patients with acute VVC. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive ibrexafungerp (300 mg twice for 1 day) or placebo. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with a clinical cure (complete resolution of vulvovaginal signs and symptoms [VSS] = 0) at test-of-cure (day 11 ± 3). Secondary endpoints included the percentage of patients with mycological eradication, overall success (clinical cure and mycological eradication), clinical improvement (VSS ≤ 1) at test-of-cure, and symptom resolution at follow-up (day 25 ± 4). RESULTS: Patients receiving ibrexafungerp had significantly higher rates of clinical cure (50.5% [95/188] vs 28.6% [28/98]; P = .001), mycological eradication (49.5% [93/188] vs 19.4% [19/98]; P < .001), and overall success (36.0% [64/178] vs 12.6% [12/95]; P < .001) compared with placebo. Symptom resolution was sustained and further increased with ibrexafungerp compared with placebo (59.6% [112/188] vs 44.9% [44/98]; P = .009) at follow-up. Post hoc analysis showed similar rates of clinical cure and clinical improvement at test-of-cure for Black patients (54.8% [40/73] and 63.4% [47/73], respectively) and patients with a body mass index >35 (54.5% [24/44] and 68.2% [30/44], respectively) compared with overall rates. Ibrexafungerp was well tolerated. Adverse events were primarily gastrointestinal and mild in severity. CONCLUSIONS: Ibrexafungerp provides a promising safe and efficacious oral treatment that mechanistically differs from current azole treatment options for acute VVC.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a 2022 study, ibrexafungerp improved clinical cure rates compared to placebo (50.5% vs. 28.6%) in acute VVC.
“The study actually showed an improvement in clinical cure rates compared to the placebo group (50.5% vs. 28.6%).”
From Treatment of Vulvovaginal Candidiasis—An Overview of Guidelines and the Latest Treatment Methods (2023) · cites this paper as [57]
Phase III clinical trials have shown that ibrexafungerp is effective in inducing a complete clinical response with sustained resolution of symptoms compared to placebo in patients with acute VVC.
“Phase III clinical trials have shown that ibrexafungerp is effective in inducing a complete clinical response with sustained resolution of symptoms compared to placebo in patients with acute VVC [57].”
From Treatment of Vulvovaginal Candidiasis—An Overview of Guidelines and the Latest Treatment Methods (2023) · cites this paper as [57]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 26 · Cited by 82
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [4]Jeanmonod R, Jeanmonod D. Vaginal candidiasis. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/. Accessed 9 March 2021.
- Authors
- Schwebke, J. R., Sobel, R., Gersten, J. K., Sussman, S. A., Lederman, S. N., Jacobs, M. A., Chappell, B. T., Weinstein, D. L., Moffett, A. H., Azie, N. E., Angulo, D. A., Harriott, I. A., Borroto-Esoda, K., Ghannoum, M. A., Nyirjesy, P., & Sobel, J. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
- Thomas Jefferson University (US)
- New Age Medical Research Corp , Miami, Florida , USA
- Lawrence OB/GYN Clinical Research , Lawrenceville, New Jersey , USA
- Altus Research Inc, Lake Worth, Florida , USA
- Life Research , Inc, Houston, Texas , USA
- WR-Medical Research Center of Memphis, LLC , Memphis, Tennessee , USA
- Consultants in Women’s Healthcare, Inc , St. Louis, Missouri , USA
- Lake OB/GYN Associates of Mid-Florida (US)
- Scynexis (United States) (US)
- KBE Consulting , Raleigh, North Carolina , USA
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center (US)
- Wayne State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sobel, Jack D
- Venue
- Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2021-09-01
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1979-1985
- ISSN
- 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6591
- PMC
- PMC9187327
- OpenAlex
- W3196992108
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 4.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Case Western Reserve University
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Infections and Treatments
- Keywords
- ibrexafungerp, vaginal candidiasis, Candida, clinical cure, placebo comparison, Black patients, obesity, gastrointestinal adverse effects, drug safety, treatment efficacy and safety, symptom resolution, test of cure
- MeSH terms
- Antifungal Agents, Azoles, Candidiasis, Vulvovaginal, Female, Glycosides, Humans, Triterpenes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review