The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Secular Trends in Nosocomial Bloodstream Infections: Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria Increase the Total Burden of Infection
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether rising incidence rates of nosocomial bloodstream infections (BSIs) caused by antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARB) replace antibiotic-susceptible bacteria (ASB), leaving the total BSI rate unaffected. METHODS: We investigated temporal trends in annual incidence densities (events per 100 000 patient-days) of nosocomial BSIs caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), ARB other than MRSA, and ASB in 7 ARB-endemic and 7 ARB-nonendemic hospitals between 1998 and 2007. RESULTS: 33 130 nosocomial BSIs (14% caused by ARB) yielded 36 679 microorganisms. From 1998 to 2007, the MRSA incidence density increased from 0.2 to 0.7 (annual increase, 22%) in ARB-nonendemic hospitals, and from 3.1 to 11.7 (annual increase, 10%) in ARB-endemic hospitals (P = .2), increasing the incidence density difference between ARB-endemic and ARB-nonendemic hospitals from 2.9 to 11.0. The non-MRSA ARB incidence density increased from 2.8 to 4.1 (annual increase, 5%) in ARB-nonendemic hospitals, and from 1.5 to 17.4 (annual increase, 22%) in ARB-endemic hospitals (P < .001), changing the incidence density difference from -1.3 to 13.3. Trends in ASB incidence densities were similar in both groups (P = .7). With annual increases of 3.8% and 5.4% of all nosocomial BSIs in ARB-nonendemic and ARB-endemic hospitals, respectively (P < .001), the overall incidence density difference of 3.8 increased to 24.4. CONCLUSIONS: Increased nosocomial BSI rates due to ARB occur in addition to infections caused by ASB, increasing the total burden of disease. Hospitals with high ARB infection rates in 2005 had an excess burden of BSI of 20.6 per 100 000 patient-days in a 10-year period, mainly caused by infections with ARB.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Antibiotic resistance-the need for global solutions
Laxminarayan, R., Duse, A., Wattal, C., Zaidi, A. K. M., Wertheim, H. F. L., Sumpradit, N., Vlieghe, E., Hara, G. L., Gould, I. M., Goossens, H., et al. (2013) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(13)70318-9 · Cited by 4,439
Cahill, T. J., & Prendergast, B. D. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00067-7 · Cited by 991
Hasim, S., Allison, D. P., Retterer, S. T., Hopke, A., Wheeler, R. T., Doktycz, M. J., & Reynolds, T. B. (2017) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.00601-16 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Ammerlaan, H. S. M., Harbarth, S., Buiting, A. G. M., Crook, D. W., Fitzpatrick, F., Hanberger, H., Herwaldt, L. A., van Keulen, P. H. J., Kluytmans, J. A. J. W., Kola, A., Kuchenbecker, R. S., Lingaas, E., Meessen, N., Morris-Downes, M. M., Pottinger, J. M., Rohner, P., dos Santos, R. P., Seifert, H., Wisplinghoff, H., Ziesing, S., Walker, A. S., & Bonten, M. J. M.
- Venue
- Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-12-07
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 798-805
- ISSN
- 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6591
- OpenAlex
- W2133736418
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Secular Trends in Nosocomial Bloodstream Infections: Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria Increase the Total Burden of Infection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/cid/cis1006
- The paper
- Ammerlaan, H. S. M., Harbarth, S., Buiting, A. G. M., Crook, D. W., Fitzpatrick, F., Hanberger, H., Herwaldt, L. A., van Keulen, P. H. J., Kluytmans, J. A. J. W., Kola, A., Kuchenbecker, R. S., Lingaas, E., Meessen, N., Morris-Downes, M. M., Pottinger, J. M., Rohner, P., dos Santos, R. P., Seifert, H., Wisplinghoff, H., . . . Bonten, M. J. M. (2013). Secular Trends in Nosocomial Bloodstream Infections: Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria Increase the Total Burden of Infection. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cis1006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.