Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 175

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cefepime Therapy for Monomicrobial Bacteremia Caused by Cefepime-Susceptible Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase–Producing Enterobacteriaceae: MIC Matters

Lee, Nan-Yao, Lee, Ching-Chi, Huang, Wei-Han, Tsui, Ko-Chung, Hsueh, Po-Ren, Ko, Wen-Chien·2013·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae isolates are important clinical pathogens. In addition, the efficacy of cefepime for such infections is controversial. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of monomicrobial bacteremia caused by ESBL producers at 2 medical centers between May 2002 and August 2007. The patients definitively treated with in vitro active cefepime (cases) were compared with those treated with a carbapenem (controls) in a propensity score-matched analysis to assess therapeutic effectiveness. The 30-day crude mortality is the primary endpoint. RESULTS: A total of 178 patients were eligible for the study. Patients who received cefepime (n = 17) as definitive therapy were more likely to have a clinical failure (odds ratio [OR] 6.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-22.5; P = .002), microbiological failure (OR 5.5; 95% CI, 1.3-25.6; P = .04), and 30-day mortality (OR 7.1; 95% CI, 2.5-20.3; P < .001) than those who received carbapenem therapy (n = 161). Multivariate regression revealed that a critical illness with a Pitt bacteremia score ≥ 4 points (OR 5.4; 95% CI, 1.4-20.9; P = .016), a rapidly fatal underlying disease (OR 4.4; 95% CI, 1.5-12.6; P = .006), and definitive cefepime therapy (OR 9.9; 95% CI, 2.8-31.9; P < .001) were independently associated with 30-day crude mortality. There were 17 case-control pairs in the propensity scores matched analysis. The survival analysis consistently found that individuals who received cefepime therapy had a lower survival rate (log-rank test, P = .016). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the current Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute susceptible breakpoint of cefepime (minimum inhibitory concentration ≤ 8 μg/mL), cefepime definitive therapy is inferior to carbapenem therapy in treating patients with so-called cefepime-susceptible ESBL-producer bacteremia.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cid/cis916

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 175

Metadata

Authors
Lee, N.-Y., Lee, C.-C., Huang, W.-H., Tsui, K.-C., Hsueh, P.-R., & Ko, W.-C.
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2012-10-22
Volume
56
Issue
4
Pages
488-495
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W2160971726
Cited by
175
References
2
FWCI
7.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cefepime Therapy for Monomicrobial Bacteremia Caused by Cefepime-Susceptible Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase–Producing Enterobacteriaceae: MIC Matters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/cid/cis916
The paper
Lee, N.-Y., Lee, C.-C., Huang, W.-H., Tsui, K.-C., Hsueh, P.-R., & Ko, W.-C. (2013). Cefepime Therapy for Monomicrobial Bacteremia Caused by Cefepime-Susceptible Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase–Producing Enterobacteriaceae: MIC Matters. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cis916

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.