The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus Infection Among People Who Are Actively Injecting Drugs: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Although guidelines recommend that people who inject drugs (PWID) should not be excluded from hepatitis C (HCV) treatment, some services remain reluctant to treat PWID. The aim of this review was to investigate sustained virologic response (SVR), adherence, discontinuation, and HCV reinfection among PWID. METHODS: A search of Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases (between 2002 and January 2012) was conducted for primary articles/conference abstracts examining HCV treatment outcomes in PWID. Meta-analysis was used to obtain pooled estimates of SVR, adherence, discontinuation, and HCV reinfection. RESULTS: Ten primary articles and 1 conference abstract met the inclusion criteria. Across 6 studies (comprising 314 drug users, of whom 141 [45%] were PWID), pooled SVR was 56% (95% confidence interval [CI], 50%-61%) for all genotypes, 37% (95% CI, 26%-48%) for genotypes 1/4, and 67% (95% CI, 56%-78%) for genotypes 2/3. Pooled 80/80/80 adherence was 82% (95% CI, 74%-89%) across 2 studies, and pooled treatment discontinuation was 22% (95% CI, 16%-27%) across 4 studies. Across 5 studies (comprising 131 drug users) examining reinfection, pooled risk was 2.4 (95% CI, .9-6.1) per 100 person-years. CONCLUSIONS: HCV treatment outcomes are acceptable in PWID, supporting treatment guidelines. The pooled estimate of HCV reinfection risk was low, but there was considerable uncertainty around this estimate. Further studies on the risk of reinfection are needed to assess the long-term effectiveness of HCV treatment in PWID.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
(2004) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490 · Cited by 8,477
Cited by
EASL recommendations on treatment of hepatitis C: Final update of the series☆
Pawlotsky, J.-M., Negro, F., Aghemo, A., Berenguer, M., Dalgard, O., Dusheiko, G., Marra, F., Puoti, M., & Wedemeyer, H. (2020) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2020.08.018 · Cited by 1,252
Public health and international drug policy
Csete, J., Kamarulzaman, A., Kazatchkine, M., Altice, F., Balicki, M., Buxton, J., Cepeda, J., Comfort, M., Goosby, E., Goulão, J., et al. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)00619-x · Cited by 641
Barua, S., Greenwald, R., Grebely, J., Dore, G. J., Swan, T., & Taylor, L. E. (2015) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m15-0406 · Cited by 401
Self-citationDore, G. J., Altice, F., Litwin, A. H., Dalgard, O., Gane, E. J., Shibolet, O., Luetkemeyer, A., Nahass, R., Peng, C.-Y., Conway, B., et al. (2016) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m16-0816 · Cited by 359
Self-citationIngiliz, P., Martin, T. C., Rodger, A., Stellbrink, H.-J., Mauss, S., Boesecke, C., Mandorfer, M., Bottero, J., Baumgarten, A., Bhagani, S., et al. (2017) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2016.09.004 · Cited by 173
Metadata
- Authors
- Aspinall, E. J., Corson, S., Doyle, J. S., Grebely, J., Hutchinson, S. J., Dore, G. J., Goldberg, D. J., & Hellard, M. E.
- Venue
- Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-08-15
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- suppl_2
- Pages
- S80-S89
- ISSN
- 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6591
- OpenAlex
- W2006747389
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus Infection Among People Who Are Actively Injecting Drugs: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/cid/cit306
- The paper
- Aspinall, E. J., Corson, S., Doyle, J. S., Grebely, J., Hutchinson, S. J., Dore, G. J., Goldberg, D. J., & Hellard, M. E. (2013). Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus Infection Among People Who Are Actively Injecting Drugs: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cit306
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.