Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: An Evolving Pathogen
Abstract
The horizontal transmission of methicillin resistance to Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in hospital and community settings, and growing prevalence of these strains, presents a significant clinical challenge to the management of serious infections worldwide. While infection control initiatives have stemmed the rising prevalence, MRSA remains a significant pathogen. More recently, evidence that MRSA is becoming resistant to glycopeptides and newer therapies raises concern about the use of these therapies in clinical practice. Vancomycin resistance has become evident in select clinical settings through rising MICs, growing awareness of heteroresistance, and emergence of intermediate-resistant and fully resistant strains. While resistance to linezolid and daptomycin remains low overall, point mutations leading to resistance have been described for linezolid, and horizontal transmission of cfr-mediated resistance to linezolid has been reported in clinical isolates. These resistance trends for newer therapies highlight the ongoing need for new and more potent antimicrobial therapies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Published studies estimate that the overall prevalence of MRSA strains with hVISA/VISA profile ranges between 0 and 8.24%, but it can be as high as 30% in selected populations (e.g. patients with MRSA infective endocarditis).
“Published studies estimate that the overall prevalence of MRSA strains with hVISA/VISA profile range between 0 and 8.24%, but it can be as high as 30% in selected populations (e.g. patients with MRSA infective endocarditis) (102, 103).”
From Mechanisms of Antibiotic Resistance (2016) · cites this paper as [102]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 118 · Cited by 334
- Authors
- Stryjewski, M. E., & Corey, G. R.
- Affiliations
- Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciones Clínicas Norberto Quirno (AR)
- Duke University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Stryjewski, M. E.
- ORCID
- Stryjewski, M. E.
- Venue
- Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-12-16
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- suppl 1
- Pages
- S10-S19
- ISSN
- 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6591
- OpenAlex
- W2048892639
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 118
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 15
- FWCI
- 3.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
- Keywords
- methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, horizontal transmission, community-acquired MRSA, hospital-acquired MRSA, glycopeptide resistance, vancomycin resistance, heteroresistance, intermediate resistance, linezolid resistance, daptomycin resistance, cfr gene, antimicrobial resistance trends, infection control
- MeSH terms
- Anti-Bacterial Agents, Biological Evolution, Glycopeptides, Humans, Staphylococcal Infections, Point Mutation, Gene Transfer, Horizontal, Drug Resistance, Bacterial, Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review