Syphilis Self-testing: A Nationwide Pragmatic Study Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in China
Open accessAbstract
Background: Syphilis self-testing may help expand syphilis testing among men who have sex with men (MSM). China has rapidly scaled up human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) self-testing, creating an opportunity for integrated syphilis self-testing. However, there is a limited literature on implementing syphilis self-testing. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among Chinese MSM in 2018. Participants completed a survey instrument including sociodemographic characteristics, sexual behaviors, syphilis self-testing, and HIV self-testing history. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to identify correlates of syphilis self-testing. We also recorded potential harms associated with syphilis self-testing. Results: Six hundred ninety-nine MSM from 89 cities in 21 provinces in China completed the study. A total of 361/699 (51.7%) men tested for syphilis, of whom 174/699 (24.9%) men used syphilis self-testing. Among 174 who had self-tested, 90 (51.7%) reported that the self-test was their first syphilis test and 161 (92.5%) reported that they undertook syphilis self-testing together with HIV self-testing. After adjusting for covariates, syphilis self-testing was correlated with disclosure of sexual orientation to family or friends (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.32–2.73), reporting 2–5 male sexual partners (aOR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.04–3.16), HIV self-testing (aOR, 39.90; 95% CI, 17.00–93.61), and never tested for syphilis in the hospital (aOR, 2.96; 95% CI, 1.86–4.72). Self-reported harms associated with syphilis self-testing were minimal. Conclusions: Scaling up syphilis self-testing could complement facility-based testing in China among MSM. Self-testing may increase first-time testing and has limited harms. Our findings suggest that syphilis self-testing could be integrated into HIV self-testing services.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The systematic review included 12 publications of about seven different studies, of which two were RCTs.
“Overall, the review included 12 publications of about seven different studies (61-72), of which two were RCTs (64, 66).”
Syphilis self-testing, including dual HIV/syphilis self-testing, was well accepted and desirable overall.
“Syphilis self-testing, including dual HIV/syphilis self-testing, was well accepted and desirable overall (62, 63, 67-69).”
Several studies showed that most participants were able to correctly self-test.
“Several studies showed that most participants were able to correctly self-test (62, 64, 66-69).”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wang, C., Ong, J. J., Zhao, P., Weideman, A. M., Tang, W., Smith, M. K., Marks, M., Fu, H., Cheng, W., Terris-Prestholt, F., et al. (2022) · PLOS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003930 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Self-citationWang, C., Li, X., Wang, Y., & Yang, B. (2022) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.744240 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationNhamo, D., Mangenah, C., Chapwanya, G., Mamvuto, T., Mahaka, I., Sri-Pathmanathan, C., Ferrand, R. A., Kranzer, K., Terris-Prestholt, F., Marks, M., et al. (2023) · Sexual Health · doi:10.1071/sh23038 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Wang, C., Cheng, W., Li, C., Tang, W., Ong, J. J., Smith, M. K., Fu, H., Marks, M., Nie, J., Zheng, H., Tucker, J. D., & Yang, B.
- Affiliations
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CN)
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Eastern Virginia Medical School (US)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Corresponding author
- Tucker, Joseph D
- ORCID
- Venue
- Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2019-07-01
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2178-2186
- ISSN
- 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6591
- PMC
- PMC7201417
- OpenAlex
- W2956128372
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 4.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
- Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
- UNC Libraries
- Funders
- Southern Medical University
- National Institutes of Health (UG3HD096929, K24AI143471)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
- Keywords
- men who have sex with men, HIV self-testing, coming out, sexual partners, China
- MeSH terms
- Sexual and Gender Minorities, China, Cities, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sexual Behavior, Syphilis, HIV Infections, Prevalence, Homosexuality, Male
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review