The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The evolution of the industrial organisation of the production of knowledge
Abstract
This work elaborates the notion of localised technological knowledge, based upon the distinction between information, competence and knowledge, and analyses the emergence of the new knowledge industry. The evolution of the organisation of knowledge production is analysed through four stylised modes: scientific entrepreneurship, institutional variety, vertical integration and technological cooperation. The new trends towards the growth of knowledge-intensive business service industries are detected and underlined. They are considered as the outcome of the institutional formation of a market for knowledge based upon a process of increasing appropriability of localised knowledge based on: the blending of generic scientific information and competence and growing scope of applicability via computercommunication systems; deverticalisation of research activities from the boundaries of corporations; the specification of a demand for technological competence; and the specialising of independent firms in the production of technological competence and knowledge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R & D
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2233763 · Cited by 7,530
Toward a new economics of science
Partha, D., & David, P. A. (1994) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(94)01002-1 · Cited by 2,448
Cited by
Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension
Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2002.6587995 · Cited by 10,758
Adapting the Uppsala model to a modern world: Macro-context and microfoundations
Coviello, N., Kano, L., & Liesch, P. W. (2017) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/s41267-017-0120-x · Cited by 446
Metadata
- Authors
- Antonelli, C.
- Venue
- Cambridge Journal of Economics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-03-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 243-260
- ISSN
- 0309-166X (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3545
- OpenAlex
- W2074273132
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 26.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The evolution of the industrial organisation of the production of knowledge. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/cje/23.2.243
- The paper
- Antonelli, C. (1999). The evolution of the industrial organisation of the production of knowledge. Cambridge Journal of Economics. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/23.2.243
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.