The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of Intra-and Interindividual Variation on the Appropriate Use of Normal Ranges
Abstract
Normal ranges based on the distribution of single samples from a large number of individuals reflect both intra- and interindividual variation. If the average ratio of these two sources of variation is small, then, assuming gaussian distributions, the conventional normal range will usually include a larger than expected proportion of an individual's distribution of values. When the average ratio exceeds 1.4, the normal range will include a proportion either larger or smaller than expected, depending on whether the individual's variability is less than or greater than average intra-individual variation. Investigation of multivariate normal regions in certain cases where calculations are feasible produced similar results. With these numerical guidelines, data from recent blood-chemistry studies indicate that conventional normal ranges are likely to be less sensitive than desired to significant changes in an individual's biochemical state. This analysis supports the continued development and use of cumulative (in time) systems for reporting laboratory test results for individuals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Anderson, N. L., & Anderson, N. G. (2002) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.r200007-mcp200 · Cited by 4,414
Generation and Application of Data on Biological Variation in Clinical Chemistry
Fraser, G. G., & Harris, E. K. (1989) · Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences · doi:10.3109/10408368909106595 · Cited by 870
Self-citationAndersen, S., Pedersen, K. M., Bruun, N. H., & Laurberg, P. (2002) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem.87.3.8165 · Cited by 686
Dehydration: Physiology, Assessment, and Performance Effects
Cheuvront, S. N., & Kenefick, R. W. (2014) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.c130017 · Cited by 461
The Evidence for a Narrower Thyrotropin Reference Range Is Compelling
Wartofsky, L., & Dickey, R. A. (2005) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2005-0455 · Cited by 424
Metadata
- Authors
- Harris, E. K.
- Venue
- Clinical Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1974-12-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1535-1542
- ISSN
- 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8561
- OpenAlex
- W1952350108
- Cited by
- 324
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Intra-and Interindividual Variation on the Appropriate Use of Normal Ranges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/clinchem/20.12.1535
- The paper
- Harris, E. K. (1974). Effects of Intra-and Interindividual Variation on the Appropriate Use of Normal Ranges. Clinical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/20.12.1535
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.