The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Specificity of sensitive assays of thyrotropin (TSH) used to screen for thyroid disease in hospitalized patients.
Abstract
Thyrotropin (TSH) concentrations were measured in 1580 hospitalized patients and 109 normal persons. Using the mean +/- 3 SD limits of the log values for the controls (0.35-6.7 milli-int. units/L), the proportion of abnormal TSH results in the hospitalized patients was 17.2%. TSH was undetectable (less than 0.1 milli-int. unit/L) in 3.1% of patients, suggesting hyperthyroidism, and high (greater than 20 milli-int. units/L) in 1.6%, suggesting hypothyroidism. On follow-up of 329 patients, 62% with abnormal TSH (less than 0.35 or greater than 6.7 milli-int. units/L) and 38% with normal TSH concentrations, only 24% of those with undetectable TSH had thyroid disease: 36% of them were being treated with glucocorticoids and 40% had nonthyroidal illness (NTI). Although half the patients with TSH greater than 20 milli-int. units/L had thyroid disease, 45% of patients had high TSH values associated with NTI. TSH concentrations usually returned towards normal when patients' therapy with glucocorticoids was discontinued or they recovered from NTI. TSH test sensitivity appeared good when the mean +/- 3 SD limits of the reference population were used, i.e., no cases of hyper- or hypothyroidism, as identified by free thyroxin index (FT4I), were missed. However, TSH test specificity was inferior to that of the FT4I test (90.7% vs 92.3%), although specificity could be improved to 97.0% if the wider TSH reference limits of 0.1 to 20 milli-int. units/L were used--limits considered pathological if applied to outpatients. Evidently, different reference intervals for TSH are needed for hospitalized and nonhospitalized patients. We conclude that a "sensitive TSH assay" is not a cost-effective thyroid screening test for hospitalized patients as compared with the FT4I.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Subclinical Hypothyroidism: A Review
Biondi, B., Cappola, A. R., & Cooper, D. S. (2019) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2019.9052 · Cited by 604
Mechanisms behind the non-thyroidal illness syndrome: an update
Warner, M. H., & Beckett, G. J. (2010) · Journal of Endocrinology · doi:10.1677/joe-09-0412 · Cited by 432
Applications of a New Chemiluminometric Thyrotropin Assay to Subnormal Measurement*
SPENCER, C. A., LoPRESTI, J. S., PATEL, A., GUTTLER, R. B., EIGEN, A., SHEN, D., GRAY, D., & NICOLOFF, J. T. (1990) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem-70-2-453 · Cited by 371
Self-citationThyrotoxicosis in patients with COVID-19: the THYRCOV study
Lania, A., Sandri, M. T., Cellini, M., Mirani, M., Lavezzi, E., & Mazziotti, G. (2020) · European Journal of Endocrinology · doi:10.1530/eje-20-0335 · Cited by 355
Euthyroid Sick Syndrome: Is It a Misnomer?
Chopra, I. J. (1997) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem.82.2.3745 · Cited by 374
Metadata
- Authors
- Spencer, C., Eigen, A., Shen, D., Duda, M., Qualls, S., Weiss, S., & Nicoloff, J.
- Venue
- Clinical Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1987-08-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1391-1396
- ISSN
- 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8561
- OpenAlex
- W1926383321
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Specificity of sensitive assays of thyrotropin (TSH) used to screen for thyroid disease in hospitalized patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/clinchem/33.8.1391
- The paper
- Spencer, C., Eigen, A., Shen, D., Duda, M., Qualls, S., Weiss, S., & Nicoloff, J. (1987). Specificity of sensitive assays of thyrotropin (TSH) used to screen for thyroid disease in hospitalized patients. Clinical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/33.8.1391
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.