Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 379

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

On dividing reference data into subgroups to produce separate reference ranges

Harris, E K, Boyd, J C·1990·Clinical Chemistry

Abstract

We consider statistical criteria for partitioning a reference database to obtain separate reference ranges for different subpopulations. Using general formulas relating population variances, sample sizes, and the normal deviate test for the significance of the difference between two subgroup means, we show that partitioning into separate ranges produces little reduction in between-person variability, even when the differences between means are highly significant statistically. However, when there is a clear physiological basis for distinguishing between certain subgroups, simulation studies show that partitioning may be necessary to obtain reference limits that cut off the desired proportions of low and high values in each subgroup. Guidelines based on these results are provided to help decide whether separate ranges should be obtained for a given analyte.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/clinchem/36.2.265

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 379

Metadata

Authors
Harris, E. K., & Boyd, J. C.
Venue
Clinical Chemistry
Published
1990-02-01
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
265-270
ISSN
  • 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8561
OpenAlex
W1960418068
Cited by
379
References
0
FWCI
1.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On dividing reference data into subgroups to produce separate reference ranges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/clinchem/36.2.265
The paper
Harris, E. K., & Boyd, J. C. (1990). On dividing reference data into subgroups to produce separate reference ranges. Clinical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/36.2.265

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.