The Role of Food and Drug Administration Regulation of in Vitro Diagnostic Devices—Applications to Genetics Testing
Abstract
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been involved in the regulation of in vitro diagnostic devices (IVDs or laboratory tests) since the introduction of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976. IVDs developed as kits or systems intended for use in multiple laboratories require review by the FDA before being marketed to ensure appropriate performance and labeling. IVDs developed as in-house, or so-called “home-brew”, tests or laboratory test services are considered medical devices, but historically have not been subject to premarket review as a matter of enforcement discretion. FDA recently established a new regulatory paradigm for in-house tests based on classification of the active ingredients or building blocks of these tests as analyte-specific reagents (ASRs). ASRs are exempt from premarket review but subject to both manufacturing and labeling controls. Currently, genetic tests are received and reviewed by the FDA in the same manner as other in vitro diagnostic tests. The FDA currently is in the process of chartering a new genetics advisory panel to provide the agency with outside expertise to deal with genetic testing issues. We are also continuing to work with other agencies within the Department of Health and Human Services to determine how we can cooperatively help foster this important new area of testing.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In vitro diagnostic devices examine human samples to support and assist in diagnosis, screening, and disease monitoring.
“Examples include in vitro diagnostic devices (IVDs), such as cholesterol panels and genetic tests, which examine human samples to support and assist in diagnosis, screening, and disease monitoring [324].”
From Toward Safer Diagnoses: A SEIPS-Based Narrative Review of Diagnostic Errors (2026) · cites this paper as [324]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 2 · Cited by 32
- Authors
- Gutman, S.
- Affiliations
- United States Food and Drug Administration (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gutman, Steven
- Venue
- Clinical Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-05-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 746-749
- ISSN
- 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8561
- OpenAlex
- W2170833682
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 7.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Clinical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Regulation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
- Keywords
- FDA regulation, in vitro diagnostic medical devices, genetic testing, Medical Device Amendments of 1976, premarket review, regulatory classification, production control, enforcement discretion, inter-agency cooperation
- MeSH terms
- Genetic Techniques, Genetics, Medical, Humans, United States, United States Food and Drug Administration, Clinical Laboratory Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review