Cited by 32Healthcare RegulationBiomedical Ethics and RegulationClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control

The Role of Food and Drug Administration Regulation of in Vitro Diagnostic Devices—Applications to Genetics Testing

Gutman, Steven·1999·Clinical Chemistry

Abstract

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been involved in the regulation of in vitro diagnostic devices (IVDs or laboratory tests) since the introduction of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976. IVDs developed as kits or systems intended for use in multiple laboratories require review by the FDA before being marketed to ensure appropriate performance and labeling. IVDs developed as in-house, or so-called “home-brew”, tests or laboratory test services are considered medical devices, but historically have not been subject to premarket review as a matter of enforcement discretion. FDA recently established a new regulatory paradigm for in-house tests based on classification of the active ingredients or building blocks of these tests as analyte-specific reagents (ASRs). ASRs are exempt from premarket review but subject to both manufacturing and labeling controls. Currently, genetic tests are received and reviewed by the FDA in the same manner as other in vitro diagnostic tests. The FDA currently is in the process of chartering a new genetics advisory panel to provide the agency with outside expertise to deal with genetic testing issues. We are also continuing to work with other agencies within the Department of Health and Human Services to determine how we can cooperatively help foster this important new area of testing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/clinchem/45.5.746

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In vitro diagnostic devices examine human samples to support and assist in diagnosis, screening, and disease monitoring.

    “Examples include in vitro diagnostic devices (IVDs), such as cholesterol panels and genetic tests, which examine human samples to support and assist in diagnosis, screening, and disease monitoring [324].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 2 · Cited by 32

Authors
Gutman, S.
Affiliations
United States Food and Drug Administration (US)
Corresponding author
Gutman, Steven
Venue
Clinical Chemistry
Published
1999-05-01
Volume
45
Issue
5
Pages
746-749
ISSN
  • 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8561
OpenAlex
W2170833682
Cited by
32
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 3
FWCI
7.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Regulation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Keywords
FDA regulation, in vitro diagnostic medical devices, genetic testing, Medical Device Amendments of 1976, premarket review, regulatory classification, production control, enforcement discretion, inter-agency cooperation
MeSH terms
Genetic Techniques, Genetics, Medical, Humans, United States, United States Food and Drug Administration, Clinical Laboratory Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review