Tau and Aβ42 in Cerebrospinal Fluid from Healthy Adults 21–93 Years of Age: Establishment of Reference Values
Abstract
Background Tau protein and the 42-amino acid form of beta-amyloid (Abeta42) measured in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) have been proposed as potential biochemical diagnostic markers for Alzheimer disease. For the introduction of these assays in clinical practice, adequate reference values are of importance. Methods CSF samples were obtained from 231 neurologically and psychiatrically healthy individuals, 21-93 years of age, all with a MiniMental State examination score of 28 or above. Standardized ELISAs were used to measure tau and Abeta42 in CSF. Following IFCC recommendations, we used a rank-based method; the 0.90 and 0.10 fractiles were estimated to establish reference values for CSF-tau and CSF-Abeta42, respectively. Putative confounding factors, such as the influence of the passage of proteins from peripheral blood to CSF, influence of dysfunction of the blood-brain barrier, and freezing and thawing of CSF, were investigated. Results A correlation with age was found for CSF-tau (r = 0.60; P 500 ng/L. No correlation was found between blood-brain barrier function and CSF-tau or CSF-Abeta42. Conclusions These reference values can be applied when using CSF-tau and CSF-Abeta42 in clinical practice.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several studies suggest that increased tau phosphorylation generally reflects brain aging.
“Several studies suggest that increased tau phosphorylation generally reflects brain aging (67, 68).”
From Modeling late-onset Alzheimer’s disease neuropathology via direct neuronal reprogramming (2024) · cites this paper as [68]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 49 · Cited by 436
- Authors
- Sjögren, M., Vanderstichele, H., Ågren, H., Zachrisson, O., Edsbagge, M., Wikkelsø, C., Skoog, I., Wallin, A., Wahlund, L.-O., Marcusson, J., Nägga, K., Andreasen, N., Davidsson, P., Vanmechelen, E., & Blennow, K.
- Affiliations
- Institute of Clinical Neuroscience, Psychiatry Section and
- Fujirebio (Belgium) (BE)
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- Institute of Clinical Neuroscience, Neurology and
- University of Gothenburg (SE)
- Linköping University (SE)
- Institute of Geriatric Medicine, University of Health, 58185 Linköping, Sweden
- Spring Valley Hospital (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Clinical Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-10-01
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1776-1781
- ISSN
- 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8561
- OpenAlex
- W1919825598
- Cited by
- 436
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 6.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Clinical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
- Keywords
- tau protein, amyloid-beta 42, cerebrospinal fluid, reference values, age-related changes, Alzheimer's disease biomarkers, blood-brain barrier, healthy adults, ELISA assay
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Peptide Fragments, Reference Values, Biomarkers, Amyloid beta-Peptides
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review