Cited by 436Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control

Tau and Aβ42 in Cerebrospinal Fluid from Healthy Adults 21–93 Years of Age: Establishment of Reference Values

Sjögren, Magnus, Vanderstichele, Hugo, Ågren, Hans, Zachrisson, Olof, Edsbagge, Mikael, Wikkelsø, Carsten, Skoog, Ingmar, Wallin, Anders +7 more·2001·Clinical Chemistry

Abstract

Background Tau protein and the 42-amino acid form of beta-amyloid (Abeta42) measured in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) have been proposed as potential biochemical diagnostic markers for Alzheimer disease. For the introduction of these assays in clinical practice, adequate reference values are of importance. Methods CSF samples were obtained from 231 neurologically and psychiatrically healthy individuals, 21-93 years of age, all with a MiniMental State examination score of 28 or above. Standardized ELISAs were used to measure tau and Abeta42 in CSF. Following IFCC recommendations, we used a rank-based method; the 0.90 and 0.10 fractiles were estimated to establish reference values for CSF-tau and CSF-Abeta42, respectively. Putative confounding factors, such as the influence of the passage of proteins from peripheral blood to CSF, influence of dysfunction of the blood-brain barrier, and freezing and thawing of CSF, were investigated. Results A correlation with age was found for CSF-tau (r = 0.60; P 500 ng/L. No correlation was found between blood-brain barrier function and CSF-tau or CSF-Abeta42. Conclusions These reference values can be applied when using CSF-tau and CSF-Abeta42 in clinical practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/clinchem/47.10.1776

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 49 · Cited by 436

Authors
Sjögren, M., Vanderstichele, H., Ågren, H., Zachrisson, O., Edsbagge, M., Wikkelsø, C., Skoog, I., Wallin, A., Wahlund, L.-O., Marcusson, J., Nägga, K., Andreasen, N., Davidsson, P., Vanmechelen, E., & Blennow, K.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Clinical Neuroscience, Psychiatry Section and
  • Fujirebio (Belgium) (BE)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Institute of Clinical Neuroscience, Neurology and
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • Institute of Geriatric Medicine, University of Health, 58185 Linköping, Sweden
  • Spring Valley Hospital (US)
Venue
Clinical Chemistry
Published
2001-10-01
Volume
47
Issue
10
Pages
1776-1781
ISSN
  • 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8561
OpenAlex
W1919825598
Cited by
436
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 17
FWCI
6.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Keywords
tau protein, amyloid-beta 42, cerebrospinal fluid, reference values, age-related changes, Alzheimer's disease biomarkers, blood-brain barrier, healthy adults, ELISA assay
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Peptide Fragments, Reference Values, Biomarkers, Amyloid beta-Peptides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review