The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of Outliers and Nonhealthy Individuals on Reference Interval Estimation
Abstract
Background: Improvement in reference interval estimation using a new outlier detection technique, even with a physician-determined healthy sample, is examined. The effect of including physician-determined nonhealthy individuals in the sample is evaluated. Methods: Traditional data transformation coupled with robust and exploratory outlier detection methodology were used in conjunction with various reference interval determination techniques. A simulation study was used to examine the effects of outliers on known reference intervals. Physician-defined healthy groups with and without nonhealthy individuals were compared on real data. Results: With 5% outliers in simulated samples, the described outlier detection techniques had narrower reference intervals. Application of the technique to real data provided reference intervals that were, on average, 10% narrower than those obtained when outlier detection was not used. Only 1.6% of the samples were identified as outliers and removed from reference interval determination in both the healthy and combined samples. Conclusions: Even in healthy samples, outliers may exist. Combining traditional and robust statistical techniques provide a good method of identifying outliers in a reference interval setting. Laboratories in general do not have a well-defined healthy group from which to compute reference intervals. The effect of nonhealthy individuals in the computation increases reference interval width by ∼10%. However, there is a large deviation among analytes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Performance of Some Resistant Rules for Outlier Labeling
Hoaglin, D. C., Iglewicz, B., & Tukey, J. W. (1986) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1986.10478363 · Cited by 773
Cited by
Data mining: concepts and techniques
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-3305 · Cited by 28,531
Chandola, V., Banerjee, A., & Kumar, V. (2009) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/1541880.1541882 · Cited by 11,687
Friedrichs, K. R., Harr, K. E., Freeman, K. P., Szladovits, B., Walton, R. M., Barnhart, K. F., & Blanco‐Chavez, J. (2012) · Veterinary Clinical Pathology · doi:10.1111/vcp.12006 · Cited by 1,293
Data cleaning: detecting, diagnosing, and editing data abnormalities
Van den Broeck, J., Argeseanu Cunningham, S., Eeckels, R., & Herbst, K. (2005) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020267 · Cited by 446
Steele, A. M., Shields, B. M., Wensley, K. J., Colclough, K., Ellard, S., & Hattersley, A. T. (2014) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2013.283980 · Cited by 381
Metadata
- Authors
- Horn, P. S., Feng, L., Li, Y., & Pesce, A. J.
- Venue
- Clinical Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-12-01
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2137-2145
- ISSN
- 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8561
- OpenAlex
- W1935786512
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Outliers and Nonhealthy Individuals on Reference Interval Estimation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/clinchem/47.12.2137
- The paper
- Horn, P. S., Feng, L., Li, Y., & Pesce, A. J. (2001). Effect of Outliers and Nonhealthy Individuals on Reference Interval Estimation. Clinical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/47.12.2137
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.