Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 306

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

CYP3A5 Variant Allele Frequencies in Dutch Caucasians

Open access
van Schaik, Ron HN, van der Heiden, Ilse P, van den Anker, John N, Lindemans, Jan·2002·Clinical Chemistry

Abstract

Background: Enzymes of the cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) family are responsible for the metabolism of >50% of currently prescribed drugs. CYP3A5 is expressed in a limited number of individuals. The absence of CYP3A5 expression in ∼70% of Caucasians was recently correlated to a genetic polymorphism (CYP3A5*3). Because CYP3A5 may represent up to 50% of total CYP3A protein in individuals polymorphically expressing CYP3A5, it may have a major role in variation of CYP3A-mediated drug metabolism. Using sequencing, have been identified (Hustert et al. Pharmacogenetics 2001;11:773–9; Kuehl et al. Nat Genet 2001;27:383–91) variant alleles *2 through *7 for CYP3A5. Detection of CYP3A5 variant alleles, and knowledge about their allelic frequency in specific ethnic groups, is important to establish the clinical relevance of screening for these polymorphisms to optimize pharmacotherapy. Methods: In a group of 500 healthy Dutch Caucasian blood donors, we determined the allelic frequency of the CYP3A5*2, *3, *4, *5, *6, and *7 alleles by use of newly developed PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism assays. Results: The frequency of the defective CYP3A5*3 allele in the Dutch Caucasian population was 91%, followed by the CYP3A5*2 (1%) and CYP3A5*6 (0.1%) alleles. The CYP3A5*4, *5, and *7 alleles were not detected. Conclusions: On the basis of its allelic frequency, screening for the CYP3A5*3 allele in the Caucasian population is extremely relevant. In addition, screening for the CYP3A5*2 allele may be taken into consideration in individuals heterozygous for the CYP3A5*3 allele. The CYP3A5*4, *5, *6, and *7 alleles have low allelic frequencies that do not support initial screening.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/clinchem/48.10.1668

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 306

Metadata

Authors
van Schaik, R. H., van der Heiden, I. P., van den Anker, J. N., & Lindemans, J.
Venue
Clinical Chemistry
Published
2002-10-01
Volume
48
Issue
10
Pages
1668-1671
ISSN
  • 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8561
OpenAlex
W1894997478
Cited by
306
References
1
FWCI
10.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.