Reforming Laboratory Reimbursement: Issues, Impact and Innovations. A Summary of the Clinical Chemistry Forum Held on November 15, 2001
Abstract
The focus of the American Association for Clinical Chemistry’s 11th Clinical Chemistry Forum, held in Alexandria, VA, on November 15, 2001, was on current and future direction of Medicare reimbursement. Reimbursement issues involve coverage policies, particularly as they relate to new tests, and coding system changes, with the continued influence of the Office of the Inspector General (OIG)1 in subtly defining laboratory policies. The speakers included representatives from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), the profession of clinical chemistry, and experts on new test approval and coding issues as well as members of the legal profession with interests in laboratory-related fraud and trends in reimbursement. Appropriately, the lead-off speaker was Jeffrey Kang, Chief Clinical Officer and Director of Office of Clinical Standards and Quality, CMS. Kang, who envisages an expanded role for clinical laboratories in providing physician performance monitoring, discussed CMS’s priorities for clinical laboratories. These include coverage for tests, coding and reimbursement, medical review, enforcement of CLIA, and using laboratory data to measure physician performance. Coverage defines which items or services are eligible for reimbursement. Medical review defines when covered services are deemed medically necessary. CMS is moving toward an evidential approach to coverage and, therefore, expects evidence from those seeking coverage that use of a new technology leads t…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CMS enforces CLIA and manages certification, inspections, proficiency testing, and compliance-related activities.
“The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), responsible for enforcing CLIA, manages certification, inspections, proficiency testing, and compliance-related activities [331].”
From Toward Safer Diagnoses: A SEIPS-Based Narrative Review of Diagnostic Errors (2026) · cites this paper as [331]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Toward Safer Diagnoses: A SEIPS-Based Narrative Review of Diagnostic Errors
Yen, C., Epling, J. W., Rockwell, M., & Vaughn-Cooke, M. (2026) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics16020347 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Young, D. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Corresponding author
- Young, Donald S
- Venue
- Clinical Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-05-01
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 792-795
- ISSN
- 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8561
- OpenAlex
- W1862344567
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Clinical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Regulation
- Keywords
- Medicare reimbursement, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Office of Inspector General, medical necessity
- MeSH terms
- Medicare, Humans, Insurance, Health, Reimbursement, Clinical Laboratory Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review