The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Serum Reference Intervals and Diagnostic Ranges for Free κ and Free λ Immunoglobulin Light Chains: Relative Sensitivity for Detection of Monoclonal Light Chains
Abstract
Background: The detection of monoclonal free light chains (FLCs) is an important diagnostic aid for a variety of monoclonal gammopathies and is especially important in light-chain diseases, such as light-chain myeloma, primary systemic amyloidosis, and light-chain-deposition disease. These diseases are more prevalent in the elderly, and assays to detect and quantify abnormal amounts of FLCs require reference intervals that include elderly donors. Methods: We used an automated immunoassay for FLCs and sera from a population 21–90 years of age. We used the calculated reference and diagnostic intervals to compare FLC results with those obtained by immunofixation (IFE) to detect low concentrations of monoclonal κ and λ FLCs in the sera of patients with monoclonal gammopathies. Results: Serum κ and λ FLCs increased with population age, with an apparent change for those >80 years. This trend was lost when the FLC concentration was normalized to cystatin C concentration. The ratio of κ FLC to λ FLC (FLC K/L) did not exhibit an age-dependent trend. The diagnostic interval for FLC K/L was 0.26–1.65. The 95% reference interval for κ FLC was 3.3–19.4 mg/L, and that for λ FLC was 5.7–26.3 mg/L. Detection and quantification of monoclonal FLCs by nephelometry were more sensitive than IFE in serum samples from patients with primary systemic amyloidosis and light-chain-deposition disease. Conclusions: Reference and diagnostic intervals for serum FLCs have been developed for use with a new, automated immunoassay that makes the detection and quantification of monoclonal FLCs easier and more sensitive than with current methods. The serum FLC assay complements IFE and allows quantification of FLCs in light-chain-disease patients who have no detectable serum or urine M-spike.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma
Rajkumar, S. V., Dimopoulos, M. A., Palumbo, A., Blade, J., Merlini, G., Mateos, M.-V., Kumar, S., Hillengass, J., Kastritis, E., Richardson, P., et al. (2014) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(14)70442-5 · Cited by 4,978
Self-citationThe International Myeloma Working Group (2003) · British Journal of Haematology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2141.2003.04355.x · Cited by 2,321
Gertz, M. A., Comenzo, R., Falk, R. H., Fermand, J. P., Hazenberg, B. P., Hawkins, P. N., Merlini, G., Moreau, P., Ronco, P., Sanchorawala, V., et al. (2005) · American Journal of Hematology · doi:10.1002/ajh.20381 · Cited by 1,428
Landgren, O., Kyle, R. A., Pfeiffer, R. M., Katzmann, J. A., Caporaso, N. E., Hayes, R. B., Dispenzieri, A., Kumar, S., Clark, R. J., Baris, D., et al. (2009) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2008-12-194241 · Cited by 1,127
Self-citationDispenzieri, A., Kyle, R., Merlini, G., Miguel, J. S., Ludwig, H., Hajek, R., Palumbo, A., Jagannath, S., Blade, J., Lonial, S., et al. (2009) · Leukemia · doi:10.1038/leu.2008.307 · Cited by 815
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Katzmann, J. A., Clark, R. J., Abraham, R. S., Bryant, S., Lymp, J. F., Bradwell, A. R., & Kyle, R. A.
- Venue
- Clinical Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-09-01
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1437-1444
- ISSN
- 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8561
- OpenAlex
- W4312861613
- Cited by
- 620
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Serum Reference Intervals and Diagnostic Ranges for Free κ and Free λ Immunoglobulin Light Chains: Relative Sensitivity for Detection of Monoclonal Light Chains. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/clinchem/48.9.1437
- The paper
- Katzmann, J. A., Clark, R. J., Abraham, R. S., Bryant, S., Lymp, J. F., Bradwell, A. R., & Kyle, R. A. (2002). Serum Reference Intervals and Diagnostic Ranges for Free κ and Free λ Immunoglobulin Light Chains: Relative Sensitivity for Detection of Monoclonal Light Chains. Clinical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/48.9.1437
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.