Cited by 241Antibiotic Resistance in BacteriaAntibiotics Pharmacokinetics and EfficacyBacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing

Inoculum effect

Brook, I.·1989·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

The inoculum effect (IE) is a laboratory phenomenon that is described as a significant increase in the minimal inhibitory concentration of an antibiotic when the number of organisms inoculated is increased. The IE generally occurs with beta-lactam antibiotics in relation to beta-lactamase-producing bacteria. An IE occurs with the first- and second-generation cephalosporins against Staphylococcus aureus and less often with the quinolones, beta-lactam-resistant penicillins, cefoxitin, and aminoglycosides. An IE occurs with the penicillins against the Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas species, and a variable IE occurs with cephalosporins; however, no IE occurs with aminoglycosides, quinolones, imipenem, and chloramphenicol against these organisms. An IE occurs with beta-lactam antibiotics against Haemophilus influenzae and with the penicillins and the cephalosporins against penicillinase-producing Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Branhamella catarrhalis. An IE occurs with the penicillins and cephalosporins against the Bacteroides fragilis group; no IE occurs with cefoxitin and imipenem. Although certain antibiotics exhibit an IE, they are still capable of eradicating infections when administered appropriately. Thus, the clinical significance of this laboratory phenomenon has yet to be elucidated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/clinids/11.3.361

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The density of eukaryotic cells can have a profound influence on the outcome of toxicological studies.

    “it soon became apparent that the density of eukaryotic cells can have a profound influence on the outcome of toxicological studies (Ohnuma et al., 1986; Brook, 1989; Schildknecht et al., 2009; Schildknecht et al., 2011; Scholz et al., 2011).”

    From In Vitro research Reproducibility: Keeping up High Standards (2019) · cites this paper as Brook, 1989

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brook, I.
Affiliations
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (US)
Corresponding author
Brook, I.
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
1989-05-01
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
361-368
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W4232506861
Cited by
241
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Keywords
inoculum effect, minimum inhibitory concentration, beta-lactam antibiotics, beta-lactamase, beta-lactam resistance, cephalosporins, penicillin, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas, Haemophilus influenzae, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Bacteroides fragilis, cefoxitin, imipenem, quinolones, aminoglycosides
MeSH terms
Anti-Bacterial Agents, Bacteria, Bacterial Infections, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review