Purulent Pericarditis Caused by Candida Species: Case Report and Review
Abstract
Purulent pericarditis caused by Candida species is a rare and often undiagnosed disease. We recently treated a patient in whom purulent pericarditis due to Candida albicans developed following thoracic surgery. The patient survived after receiving a combination of surgical and medical therapy. A literature review revealed 24 additional cases of purulent pericarditis caused by Candida species. Twenty-one of the patients either had undergone thoracic surgery or had had disseminated candidiasis. None of the 12 patients described before 1980 survived, whereas six (46%) of the 13 patients described after 1980 survived. No patient survived without pericardiectomy (five of six survivors) or at least pericardiocentesis (one survivor). All survivors received full courses of amphotericin B therapy. An increased utilization of echocardiography, along with an increased recognition of the patient populations at risk, has been instrumental in early detection and improved outcome of purulent pericarditis. A combination of prolonged amphotericin B therapy and pericardiectomy appears to be the best approach for achieving a cure.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Removal of infected valves, resection of infected peripheral veins, and debridement of infected pericardial tissue are almost always required for successful therapy of candidal endocarditis, pericarditis, and suppurative phlebitis.
“removal of infected valves, resection of infected peripheral veins, and debridement of infected pericardial tissue are almost always required for successful therapy [218,219].”
From Guidelines for Treatment of Candidiasis (2004) · cites this paper as [219]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 48
- Authors
- Schrank, J. H., & Dooley, D. P.
- Affiliations
- United States Army (US)
- Brooke Army Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Schrank, J. H.
- ORCID
- Dooley, D. P.
- Venue
- Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995-07-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 182-187
- ISSN
- 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6591
- OpenAlex
- W2096018672
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Pericarditis and Cardiac Tamponade
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
- Keywords
- purulent pericarditis, Candida albicans, postoperative infection, thoracic surgery, systemic candidiasis, pericardiectomy, pericardiocentesis, amphotericin B, echocardiography, survival outcomes
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Amphotericin B, Antifungal Agents, Candida albicans, Candidiasis, Echocardiography, Humans, Male, Pericardial Effusion, Pericardiectomy, Pericarditis, Thoracic Surgery
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review