Cited by 340Tuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyInfectious Diseases and TuberculosisAntibiotic Resistance in Bacteria

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis: Review of the Worldwide Situation and the WHO/IUATLD Global Surveillance Project

Cohn, David L., Bustreo, Flavia, Raviglione, Mario C.·1997·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

The emergence of strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis that are resistant to antimycobacterial agents is a worldwide problem whose global magnitude is not well described. We reviewed and tabulated 63 surveys of resistance to antituberculous drugs that were performed between 1985 and 1994. Rates of primary resistance to isoniazid, administered as a single agent, ranged from 0 to 16.9% (median rate, 4.1%); to streptomycin, 0.1%-23.5% (median, 3.5%); to rifampin, 0-3.0% (median, 0.2%); and to ethambutol, 0-4.2% (median, 0.1%). The rates of acquired resistance to these agents, which were higher than those of primary resistance, were as follows: isoniazid, 4.0%-53.7% (median rate, 10.6%); streptomycin, 0-19.4% (median, 4.9%); rifampin 0-14.5% (median, 2.4%); and ethambutol, 0-13.7% (median, 1.8%). The highest rates of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis have been reported in Nepal (48.0%), Gujarat, India (33.8%), New York City, (30.1%), Bolivia (15.3%), and Korea (14.5%). The WHO (World Health Organization) and the IUATLD (International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease) have established a global project of drug resistance surveillance that is based on standard epidemiological methods and quality control through an extensive network of reference laboratories. Accurate drug resistance surveillance data can be used to assess and improve national tuberculosis programs.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/clinids/24.supplement_1.s121

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cohn, D. L., Bustreo, F., & Raviglione, M. C.
Affiliations
World Health Organization (CH)
Corresponding author
Cohn, David L.
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
1997-01-01
Volume
24
Issue
Supplement_1
Pages
S121-S130
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W1977261026
Cited by
340
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 18
FWCI
22.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Microbiology (medical) › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Keywords
drug-resistant tuberculosis, multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, isoniazid resistance, streptomycin resistance, rifampicin resistance, ethambutol resistance, acquired drug resistance, primary drug resistance, reference laboratory, tuberculosis control program
MeSH terms
Antitubercular Agents, Humans, International Cooperation, Population Surveillance, Global Health, World Health Organization, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review