Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 275

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Blood Cultures: Issues and Controversies

Washington, J. A., Ilstrup, D. M.·1986·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

Blood-culture procedures must be designed to overcome the intermittency and low order of magnitude of most bacteremias and fungemias and to inhibit any antimicrobial properties or components of the blood. Among the several variables affecting yields, the volume of blood cultured appears to be most important. It is recommended that at least 10 ml, and preferably 20-30 ml, of blood be obtained for each of two to three separate cultures. More than three separate blood cultures per septic episode is rarely necessary. Other issues involve the systems used for blood culture and the procedures used for their examination.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/clinids/8.5.792

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 275

Metadata

Authors
Washington, J. A., & Ilstrup, D. M.
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
1986-09-01
Volume
8
Issue
5
Pages
792-802
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W2068597692
Cited by
275
References
1
FWCI
6.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Blood Cultures: Issues and Controversies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/clinids/8.5.792
The paper
Washington, J. A., & Ilstrup, D. M. (1986). Blood Cultures: Issues and Controversies. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinids/8.5.792

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.