The basic science/clinical science interface and treatment development.
Abstract
Psychological constructs often are incorporated into treatments before they are investigated systematically from a basic-science perspective. We discuss the potential costs of such a sequence of events and the potential benefits of closer working ties between basic and clinical scientists, and we consider how applying basic knowledge of cognitive processes could enhance our understanding of psychotherapy outcome and mechanisms of action. We call upon clinical and basic scientists to engage in a more “mindful” enterprise of translational research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The development of MBPs is grounded in developments in theory, cognitive neuroscience, translational research and evidence-based practice across a range of disciplines.
“The development of MBPs is grounded in developments in theory, cognitive neuroscience (Tang et al. 2015), translational research (Strauman & Merrill, 2004; Meadows et al. 2014) and evidence-based practice across a range of disciplines.”
From What defines mindfulness-based programs? The warp and the weft (2017) · cites this paper as Strauman & Merrill, 2004
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What defines mindfulness-based programs? The warp and the weft
Crane, R. S., Brewer, J., Feldman, C., Kabat-Zinn, J., Santorelli, S., Williams, J. M. G., & Kuyken, W. (2017) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291716003317 · Cited by 868 · see citing works
The relation between self-report mindfulness and performance on tasks of sustained attention
Schmertz, S. K., Anderson, P. L., & Robins, D. L. (2009) · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10862-008-9086-0 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
- Authors
- Strauman, T. J., & Merrill, K. A.
- Affiliations
- Duke University (US)
- ORCID
- Strauman, Timothy J.
- Venue
- Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice
- Published
- 2004
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 263-266
- ISSN
- 0969-5893 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2850
- OpenAlex
- W1983804489
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 2.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Psychology Science and Practice (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Keywords
- translational research, psychotherapy outcome, mechanism of action, cognitive processes, treatment development, psychological constructs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
