The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Classification of Text Documents
Abstract
The exponential growth of the internet has led to a great deal of interest in developing useful and efficient tools and software to assist users in searching the Web. Document retrieval, categorization, routing and filtering can all be formulated as classification problems. However, the complexity of natural languages and the extremely high dimensionality of the feature space of documents have made this classification problem very difficult. We investigate four different methods for document classification: the naive Bayes classifier, the nearest neighbour classifier, decision trees and a subspace method. These were applied to seven-class Yahoo news groups (business, entertainment, health, international, politics, sports and technology) individually and in combination. We studied three classifier combination approaches: simple voting, dynamic classifier selection and adaptive classifier combination. Our experimental results indicate that the naive Bayes classifier and the subspace method outperform the other two classifiers on our data sets. Combinations of multiple classifiers did not always improve the classification accuracy compared to the best individual classifier. Among the three different combination approaches, our adaptive classifier combination method introduced here performed the best. The best classification accuracy that we are able to achieve on this seven-class problem is approximately 83%, which is comparable to the performance of other similar studies. However, the classification problem considered here is more difficult because the pattern classes used in our experiments have a large overlap of words in their corresponding documents.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Naïve Bayesian Classifier for Rapid Assignment of rRNA Sequences into the New Bacterial Taxonomy
Wang, Q., Garrity, G. M., Tiedje, J. M., & Cole, J. R. (2007) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00062-07 · Cited by 19,885
Discriminating between empirical studies and nonempirical works using automated text classification
Langlois, A., Nie, J., Thomas, J., Hong, Q. N., & Pluye, P. (2018) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1317 · Cited by 26
A Balanced Ensemble Approach to Weighting Classifiers for Text Classification
Cheong Fung, G., Yu, J., Wang, H., Cheung, D., & Liu, H. (2006) · Sixth International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM'06) · doi:10.1109/icdm.2006.2 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, Y. H.
- Venue
- The Computer Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-08-01
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 537-546
- ISSN
- 0010-4620 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2067
- OpenAlex
- W2087609354
- Cited by
- 333
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Classification of Text Documents. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/comjnl/41.8.537
- The paper
- Li, Y. H. (1998). Classification of Text Documents. The Computer Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/41.8.537
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.