The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How Many Clusters? Which Clustering Method? Answers Via Model-Based Cluster Analysis
Abstract
We consider the problem of determining the structure of clustered data, without prior knowledge of the number of clusters or any other information about their composition. Data are represented by a mixture model in which each component corresponds to a different cluster. Models with varying geometric properties are obtained through Gaussian components with different parametrizations and cross-cluster constraints. Noise and outliers can be modelled by adding a Poisson process component. Partitions are determined by the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm for maximum likelihood, with initial values from agglomerative hierarchical clustering. Models are compared using an approximation to the Bayes factor based on the Bayesian information criterion (BIC); unlike significance tests, this allows comparison of more than two models at the same time, and removes the restriction that the models compared be nested. The problems of determining the number of clusters and the clustering method are solved simultaneously by choosing the best model. Moreover, the EM result provides a measure of uncertainty about the associated classification of each data point. Examples are given, showing that this approach can give performance that is much better than standard procedures, which often fail to identify groups that are either overlapping or of varying sizes and shapes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
Golub, G. (2012) · doi:10.56021/9781421407944 · Cited by 34,505
Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis
Kaufman, L., & Rousseeuw, P. J. (1990) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316801 · Cited by 7,344
Cited by
Dormann, C. F., Elith, J., Bacher, S., Buchmann, C., Carl, G., Carré, G., Marquéz, J. R. G., Gruber, B., Lafourcade, B., Leitão, P. J., et al. (2013) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07348.x · Cited by 9,998
Jombart, T., Devillard, S., & Balloux, F. (2010) · BMC Genetics · doi:10.1186/1471-2156-11-94 · Cited by 4,963
Local-global parcellation of the human cerebral cortex from intrinsic functional connectivity MRI
Schaefer, A., Kong, R., Gordon, E. M., Laumann, T. O., Zuo, X.-N., Holmes, A. J., Eickhoff, S. B., & Yeo, B. T. T. (2018) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhx179 · Cited by 3,657
A SAS Procedure Based on Mixture Models for Estimating Developmental Trajectories
JONES, B. L., NAGIN, D. S., & ROEDER, K. (2001) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124101029003005 · Cited by 2,370
Cluster analysis and clinical asthma phenotypes
Haldar, P., Pavord, I. D., Shaw, D. E., Berry, M. A., Thomas, M., Brightling, C. E., Wardlaw, A. J., & Green, R. H. (2008) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.200711-1754oc · Cited by 1,987
Metadata
- Authors
- Fraley, C.
- Venue
- The Computer Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-08-01
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 578-588
- ISSN
- 0010-4620 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2067
- OpenAlex
- W2047555270
- Cited by
- 2,549
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 21.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How Many Clusters? Which Clustering Method? Answers Via Model-Based Cluster Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/comjnl/41.8.578
- The paper
- Fraley, C. (1998). How Many Clusters? Which Clustering Method? Answers Via Model-Based Cluster Analysis. The Computer Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/41.8.578
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.