The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A General Theory of Classificatory Sorting Strategies: 1. Hierarchical Systems
Abstract
It is shown that the computational behaviour of a hierarchical sorting-strategy depends on three properties, which are established for five conventional strategies and four measures. The conventional strategies are shown to be simple variants of a single linear system defined by four parameters. A new strategy is defined, enabling continuous variation of intensity of grouping by variation in a single parameter. An Appendix provides specifications of computer programs embodying the new principles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kriegel, H., Kröger, P., Sander, J., & Zimek, A. (2011) · WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1002/widm.30 · Cited by 900
Biogeography of tuna and billfish communities
Reygondeau, G., Maury, O., Beaugrand, G., Fromentin, J. M., Fonteneau, A., & Cury, P. (2012) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2011.02582.x · Cited by 100
Metadata
- Authors
- Lance, G. N., & Williams, W. T.
- Venue
- The Computer Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1967-02-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 373-380
- ISSN
- 0010-4620 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2067
- OpenAlex
- W2007995029
- Cited by
- 1,696
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 102.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
