The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning latent block structure in weighted networks
Open accessAbstract
Community detection is an important task in network analysis, in which we aim to learn a network partition that groups together vertices with similar community-level connectivity patterns. By finding such groups of vertices with similar structural roles, we extract a compact representation of the network's large-scale structure, which can facilitate its scientific interpretation and the prediction of unknown or future interactions. Popular approaches, including the stochastic block model (SBM), assume edges are unweighted, which limits their utility by discarding potentially useful information. We introduce the weighted stochastic block model (WSBM), which generalizes the SBM to networks with edge weights drawn from any exponential family distribution. This model learns from both the presence and weight of edges, allowing it to discover structure that would otherwise be hidden when weights are discarded or thresholded. We describe a Bayesian variational algorithm for efficiently approximating this model's posterior distribution over latent block structures. We then evaluate the WSBM's performance on both edge-existence and edge-weight prediction tasks for a set of real-world weighted networks. In all cases, the WSBM performs as well or better than the best alternatives on these tasks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fortunato, S. (2010) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2009.11.002 · Cited by 11,293
Hierarchical structure and the prediction of missing links in networks
Clauset, A., Moore, C., & Newman, M. E. J. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06830 · Cited by 2,171
Self-citationClustering in weighted networks
Opsahl, T., & Panzarasa, P. (2009) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2009.02.002 · Cited by 1,037
World citation and collaboration networks: uncovering the role of geography in science
Pan, R. K., Kaski, K., & Fortunato, S. (2012) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep00902 · Cited by 304
Dynamic Networks from Hierarchical Bayesian Graph Clustering
Park, Y., Moore, C., & Bader, J. S. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008118 · Cited by 34
Cited by
Community detection in networks: a user guide
Fortunato, S., & Hric, D. (2016) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.09.002 · Cited by 2,086
Connectomes across development reveal principles of brain maturation
Witvliet, D., Mulcahy, B., Mitchell, J. K., Meirovitch, Y., Berger, D. R., Wu, Y., Liu, Y., Koh, W. X., Parvathala, R., Holmyard, D., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03778-8 · Cited by 393
Structure and inference in annotated networks
Newman, M. E. J., & Clauset, A. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms11863 · Cited by 379
Self-citationGeerligs, L., Gözükara, D., Oetringer, D., Campbell, K. L., van Gerven, M., & Güçlü, U. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.77430 · Cited by 78
Metadata
- Authors
- Aicher, C., Jacobs, A. Z., & Clauset, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Complex Networks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-06-26
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 221-248
- ISSN
- 2051-1310 (ISSN-L)
- 2051-1329
- OpenAlex
- W2043997271
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 6.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.