The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Invasion of the raccoon dog Nyctereutes procyonoides in Europe: History of colonization, features behind its success, and threats to native fauna
Open accessAbstract
We aimed to review the history of the introduction and colonization of the raccoon dog Nyctereutes procyonoides in Europe, the features behind its successful expansion and its impact on native fauna. The raccoon dog quickly colonized new areas after being introduced to the European part of the former Soviet Union. Today it is widespread in Northern and Eastern Europe and is still spreading in Central Europe. Features behind its success include its adaptability, high reproductive potential, omnivory, hibernation in northern areas, multiple introductions with > 9000 individuals from different localities, and tendency to wander enabling gene flow between populations. Firm evidence of the raccoon dog’s negative impact on native fauna, such as a reduction in bird populations, is still scarce. Raccoon dogs may destroy waterfowl nests, although a nest predation study in Latvia did not confirm this. Predator removal studies in Finland suggested that the raccoon dog’s impact on game birds is smaller than expected. However, raccoon dogs may have caused local extinction of frog populations, especially on islands. Raccoon dogs may compete with other carnivores for food, for example for carrion in winter, or for the best habitat patches. In northern Europe potential competitors include the red fox Vulpes vulpes and the badger Meles meles, but studies of their diets or habitat preferences do not indicate severe competition. The raccoon dog is an important vector of diseases and parasites, such as rabies, Echinococcus multilocularis and Trichinella spp. and this is no doubt the most severe consequence arising from the spread of this alien species in Europe.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Factors affecting carcass use by a guild of scavengers in European temperate woodland
Selva, N., Jędrzejewska, B., Jędrzejewski, W., & Wajrak, A. (2005) · Canadian Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1139/z05-158 · Cited by 343
Diet of the raccoon dog Nyctereutes procyonoides — a canid with an opportunistic foraging strategy
Sutor, A., Kauhala, K., & Ansorge, H. (2010) · Acta Theriologica · doi:10.4098/j.at.0001-7051.035.2009 · Cited by 95
Self-citationReproductive strategies of the racoon dog and the red fox in Finland
Kauhala, K. (1996) · Acta Theriologica · doi:10.4098/at.arch.96-4 · Cited by 60
Self-citation
Cited by
Soe, E., Davison, J., Süld, K., Valdmann, H., Laurimaa, L., & Saarma, U. (2017) · Mammal Review · doi:10.1111/mam.12092 · Cited by 121
Mullins, J., McDevitt, A. D., Kowalczyk, R., Ruczyńska, I., Górny, M., & Wójcik, J. M. (2014) · Acta Theriologica · doi:10.1007/s13364-014-0180-2 · Cited by 34
Self-citationPalczewska-Komsa, M., Kalisińska, E., Kosik-Bogacka, D. I., Lanocha, N., Budis, H., Baranowska-Bosiacka, I., Gutowska, I., & Chlubek, D. (2014) · Biological Trace Element Research · doi:10.1007/s12011-014-0017-5 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Kauhala, K., & Kowalczyk, R.
- Venue
- Current Zoology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-10-01
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 584-598
- ISSN
- 1674-5507 (ISSN-L)
- 2396-9814
- OpenAlex
- W2166012450
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Invasion of the raccoon dog Nyctereutes procyonoides in Europe: History of colonization, features behind its success, and threats to native fauna. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/czoolo/57.5.584
- The paper
- Kauhala, K., & Kowalczyk, R. (2011). Invasion of the raccoon dog Nyctereutes procyonoides in Europe: History of colonization, features behind its success, and threats to native fauna. Current Zoology. https://doi.org/10.1093/czoolo/57.5.584
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.