The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
OMICtools: an informative directory for multi-omic data analysis
Open accessAbstract
Recent advances in 'omic' technologies have created unprecedented opportunities for biological research, but current software and database resources are extremely fragmented. OMICtools is a manually curated metadatabase that provides an overview of more than 4400 web-accessible tools related to genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics. All tools have been classified by omic technologies (next-generation sequencing, microarray, mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance) associated with published evaluations of tool performance. Information about each tool is derived either from a diverse set of developers, the scientific literature or from spontaneous submissions. OMICtools is expected to serve as a useful didactic resource not only for bioinformaticians but also for experimental researchers and clinicians. Database URL: http://omictools.com/.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing.
The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09534 · Cited by 7,877
Sequencing technologies – the next generation
Metzker, M. L. (2010) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2626 · Cited by 7,066
Microarray data analysis: from disarray to consolidation and consensus
Allison, D. B., Cui, X., Page, G. P., & Sabripour, M. (2006) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1749 · Cited by 1,339
Mass spectrometry in high-throughput proteomics: ready for the big time
Nilsson, T., Mann, M., Aebersold, R., Yates, J. R., Bairoch, A., & Bergeron, J. J. M. (2010) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth0910-681 · Cited by 470
Vasilevsky, N. A., Brush, M. H., Paddock, H., Ponting, L., Tripathy, S. J., LaRocca, G. M., & Haendel, M. A. (2013) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.148 · Cited by 271
Cited by
A comparison of single-cell trajectory inference methods
Saelens, W., Cannoodt, R., Todorov, H., & Saeys, Y. (2019) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0071-9 · Cited by 1,670
A comparison of automatic cell identification methods for single-cell RNA sequencing data
Abdelaal, T., Michielsen, L., Cats, D., Hoogduin, D., Mei, H., Reinders, M. J. T., & Mahfouz, A. (2019) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-019-1795-z · Cited by 628
Integrated omics: tools, advances and future approaches
Misra, B. B., Langefeld, C., Olivier, M., & Cox, L. A. (2019) · Journal of Molecular Endocrinology · doi:10.1530/jme-18-0055 · Cited by 686
Overview of methodologies for T-cell receptor repertoire analysis
Rosati, E., Dowds, C. M., Liaskou, E., Henriksen, E. K. K., Karlsen, T. H., & Franke, A. (2017) · BMC Biotechnology · doi:10.1186/s12896-017-0379-9 · Cited by 322
The how and why of lncRNA function: An innate immune perspective
Robinson, E. K., Covarrubias, S., & Carpenter, S. (2020) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms · doi:10.1016/j.bbagrm.2019.194419 · Cited by 285
Metadata
- Authors
- Henry, V. J., Bandrowski, A. E., Pepin, A.-S., Gonzalez, B. J., & Desfeux, A.
- Venue
- Database
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-07-14
- Volume
- 2014
- Issue
- 0
- Pages
- bau069-bau069
- ISSN
- 1758-0463 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2135253885
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 9.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: OMICtools: an informative directory for multi-omic data analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/database/bau069
- The paper
- Henry, V. J., Bandrowski, A. E., Pepin, A.-S., Gonzalez, B. J., & Desfeux, A. (2014). OMICtools: an informative directory for multi-omic data analysis. Database. https://doi.org/10.1093/database/bau069
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
