CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 30Hearing Impairment and CommunicationHearing Loss and RehabilitationLanguage Development and Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Language Proficiency Profile-2: Assessment of the Global Communication Skills of Deaf Children Across Languages and Modalities of Expression

Bebko, J. M.·2003·Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education
DOI 10.1093/deafed/eng034
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Data are presented from two studies that investigate the developmental trends and concurrent validity of a measure of language and communication skills for deaf children, the Language Proficiency Profile-2 (LPP-2), developed by Bebko and McKinnon (1993). The LPP-2 was designed to evaluate the overall linguistic/communicative skills of deaf children, independent of any specific language or modality of expression. It focuses on the totality of the children's communication skills. Experiment 1 investigated developmental trends of the LPP-2 for both deaf and hearing children, studying a combined sample of deaf and hearing children from the United States and Canada. Experiment 2 investigated the relationship between the LPP-2 and two commonly used measures to assess deaf children on language development (Preschool Language Scale-3) and early reading skills (Test of Early Reading Ability-Deaf/Hard-of-Hearing). Results from the two studies indicate that the LPP-2 has good utility not only as a measure of overall language development but also as a predictor of achievement for English language and early reading skills.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/deafed/eng034

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [11]11. Moeller, M. P. (1998). The deafness early intervention project: Strategies and outcomes. Paper presented at the annual Inter- national Pediatrics Conference, July 1998, Denver, CO.
  2. [12]12. Reid, D. K., Hresko, W. P., Hammill, D. D., & Wiltshire, S. M. (1991). Test of Early Reading Ability: Special Edition for Stu- dents Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing (TERA-D/HH). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

Cited by

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Bebko, J. M.
Affiliations
York University (CA)
Corresponding author
Bebko, J. M.
Venue
Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2003-10-01
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
438-451
ISSN
  • 1081-4159 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-7325
DOI
10.1093/deafed/eng034
OpenAlex
W2158528713
Cited by
30
References
11
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Washington
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Hearing Impairment and Communication
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
deaf children, language and communication skills, developmental trends, concurrent validity, early reading skills, English proficiency, hearing children comparison, student performance prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review