Simple approaches to nonlinear difference-in-differences with panel data
Open accessAbstract
Summary: I derive simple, flexible strategies for difference-in-differences settings where the nature of the response variable may warrant a nonlinear model. I allow for general staggered interventions, with and without covariates. Under an index version of parallel trends, I show that average treatment effects on the treated (ATTs) are identified for each cohort and calendar time period in which a cohort was subjected to the intervention. The pooled quasi-maximum likelihood estimators in the linear exponential family extend pooled ordinary least squares estimation of linear models. By using the conditional mean associated with the canonical link function, imputation and pooling across the entire sample produce identical estimates. Generally, pooled estimation results in very simple computation of the ATTs and their standard errors. The leading cases are a logit functional form for binary and fractional outcomes—combined with the Bernoulli quasi-log likelihood (QLL)—and an exponential mean combined with the Poisson QLL.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pooled OLS using cohort indicators in a flexible way extends to nonlinear models for binary, fractional, count, and corner solution outcomes.
“Pooled OLS using cohort indicators in a flexible way extends to nonlinear models, and I have developed those in Wooldridge (2023) for binary, fractional, count, and corner solution outcomes.”
From Two-way fixed effects, the two-way Mundlak regression, and difference-in-differences estimators (2025) · cites this paper as Wooldridge (2023)
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 34 · Cited by 260
- Authors
- Wooldridge, J. M.
- Affiliations
- Michigan State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wooldridge, Jeffrey M
- Venue
- The Econometrics Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2023-08-24
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- C31-C66
- ISSN
- 1368-4221 (ISSN-L)
- 1368-423X
- OpenAlex
- W4386163304
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 92 · 2025: 100 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 14 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 52.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Econometrics Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Keywords
- parallel trends, average treatment effect on the treated, logit model, binary outcomes, imputation, panel data
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review