The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Agroecosystem Diversity and Pest Control: Data, Tentative Conclusions, and New Research Directions
Abstract
Recent criticism of the theory that increased diversity leads to increased stability has led to widespread skepticism about the value of using ecological theory to suggest strategies of agricultural diversification to better control insect pests. A total of 150 published studies which examine the effect of diversifying an agroecosystem on insect pest abundance are summarized; 198 total herbivore species were examined in these studies: 53% of these species were found to be less abundant in the more diversified system, 18% were more abundant in the diversified system, 9% showed no difference, and 20% showed a variable response. Two major problems with the studies were: (1) proper experiments were not conducted to show that differences in pest abundance between more and less diverse systems resulted in yield differences; (2) the ecological mechanisms accounting for the differences in pest abundance were carefully examined in only a few of the studies. A fundamental understanding of these ecological mechanisms is critical to the development of a predictive theory of how agricultural diversification affects insect pests. Empirical data and several theoretical arguments are presented which suggest that differences in pest abundance between diverse and simple systems can frequently be accounted for by the response of herbivore host-finding behavior to the patterns of resource availability, rather than the activities of natural enemies. The development of ecologically sound agroecosystems may well utilize within-field plant diversity, both in developing and in developed regions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Agroecology: the science of natural resource management for poor farmers in marginal environments
Altieri, M. A. (2002) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/s0167-8809(02)00085-3 · Cited by 1,136
Self-citationKromp, B. (1999) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/s0167-8809(99)00037-7 · Cited by 915
Does plant diversity benefit agroecosystems? A synthetic review
Letourneau, D. K., Armbrecht, I., Rivera, B. S., Lerma, J. M., Carmona, E. J., Daza, M. C., Escobar, S., Galindo, V., Gutiérrez, C., López, S. D., et al. (2011) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/09-2026.1 · Cited by 888
Agricultural landscape simplification and insecticide use in the Midwestern United States
Meehan, T. D., Werling, B. P., Landis, D. A., & Gratton, C. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1100751108 · Cited by 419
Ecology of interactions between weeds and arthropods
Norris, R. F., & Kogan, M. (2005) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.49.061802.123218 · Cited by 224
Metadata
- Authors
- Risch, S. J., Andow, D., & Altieri, M. A.
- Venue
- Environmental Entomology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1983-06-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 625-629
- ISSN
- 0046-225X (ISSN-L)
- 1938-2936
- OpenAlex
- W2327759210
- Cited by
- 509
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Agroecosystem Diversity and Pest Control: Data, Tentative Conclusions, and New Research Directions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ee/12.3.625
- The paper
- Risch, S. J., Andow, D., & Altieri, M. A. (1983). Agroecosystem Diversity and Pest Control: Data, Tentative Conclusions, and New Research Directions. Environmental Entomology. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/12.3.625
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.