Influence of Peppermint Phenolics and Monoterpenes on Twospotted Spider Mite (Acari: Tetranychidae)
Abstract
We examined Tetranychus urticae (Koch) fecundity and development on three peppermint, Mentha piperita L., leaf age classes which differed significantly ( P < 0.05) in total phenolic and monoterpene content. Young, expanding lateral leaves had the highest monoterpene and phenolic content. Mature top mainstem leaves had the lowest phenolic content, and old bottom mainstem leaves had the lowest monoterpene content. As leaf phenolic content increased, the number of eggs laid per leaf significantly decreased ( P < 0.001), and dispersal of immature mites, measured as percent caught in sticky Tack- Trap cages, significantly increased ( P < 0.001). Development times of immatures on young lateral leaves were significantly longer ( P < 0.05) than on the more mature mainstem leaves. Increased activity of T. urticae may have resulted in reduced feeding rates, which may in turn have accounted for the lower number of eggs laid and the increased development time of immatures on peppermint leaves with high phenolic content. The monoterpene content of leaves was not significantly correlated with spider mite biology, perhaps because monoterpenes are sequestered in plant cells not fed on by spider mites. However, vapors from 5% solutions of menthol and pulegone significantly reduced oviposition and increased mortality of female mites confined in unventilated petri dishes ( P < 0.05).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Monoterpene vapours from peppermint have toxic effects on the spider mite Tetranychus urticae similar to those of the four compounds.
“Monoterpene vapours from peppermint have similar toxic effects on the spider mite Tetranychus urticae (Larson and Berry 1984).”
From Insecticidal, repellent, antimicrobial activity and phytotoxicity of essential oils: With special reference to limonene and its suitability for control of insect pests (2001) · cites this paper as Larson and Berry 1984
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Secondary metabolites in plant defence mechanisms
BENNETT, R. N., & WALLSGROVE, R. M. (1994) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1994.tb02968.x · Cited by 1,654 · see citing works
IBRAHIM, M. A., KAINULAINEN, P., & AFLATUNI, A. (2001) · Agricultural and Food Science · doi:10.23986/afsci.5697 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
- Authors
- Larson, K. C., & Berry, R. E.
- Affiliations
- Oregon State University (US)
- ORCID
- Larson, K. C.
- Venue
- Environmental Entomology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1984-02-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 282-285
- ISSN
- 0046-225X (ISSN-L)
- 1938-2936
- OpenAlex
- W2315493616
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Environmental Entomology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Agriculture
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Insect Pest Control Strategies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Study of Mite Species
- Keywords
- Tetranychus urticae, peppermint, phenolic compounds, monoterpenes, leaf age, oviposition, fecundity, mite dispersal, menthol, pulegone, plant-pest interactions, botanical pest control
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review